Filed under: Fun, Web services, Time-Wasters
Uncylopedia is full of lies, unlike Wikipedia?
by Brad Linder May 14th 2007
A lot of folks out there complain that you can't trust anything you read on Wikipedia. Since the online encyclopedia is written, edited and maintained by volunteers, you can never be certain that the information you're reading has been rigorously fact-checked. Sometimes the articles that are mostly true can be the most frustrating, because you're getting just enough accurate information to believe that inaccuracies might be true as well.Luckily you won't run into any of those problems with Uncyclopedia, because pretty much nothing on the site is true. But a lot of it is pretty funny.
Much like Wikipedia, anyone can write or edit Uncyclopedia articles. But in general they're humorous, sarcastic, and politically incorrect. For example, the entry on "game theory" states "Game theory, a subset of economics, sociology, and vector calculus, is the name commonly given to the study of hooking up in frat basements," and features a picture of two pills labeled "rohypnol."
[via CyberNotes]
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
