Skip to Content

Submit your nominations for the Luxist Awards' Best in Decor
AOL Tech

faroo posts

Filed under: Windows, P2P, Beta, Search

Faroo follow-up: P2P search engine will only work with more users

FarooWhen we first told you about peer-to-peer search engine Faroo last week we promised to reserve judgment until we had some time to play with it. Now that we have, we have to say we're about as unimpressed as we expected to be.

The idea behind Faroo is interesting. The site indexes the web without maintaining a centralized database. Rather, users install a client on their PCs (Windows 2000 and up), and Faroo tracks the web sites those users visit.

When you go to perform a search, Faroo will only search sites that real people have visited. This is both the service's strength and its weakness. You don't get a lot of junk sites this way. But since Faroo is in private beta with a limited user pool, you don't get many sites at all that way.

For example, a Google search for the words "Download" and "Squad" pull up over 9 million results. Not all of them are relevant if you're looking for our web page. But Faroo pulls up just 5. More might not always be better, but at least it's not too few. If Faroo catches on and gets an enormous user base, perhaps this search engine could be great. But as with any social/user-generated software, there's a chicken and egg problem. It's hard to market a product that has a small user base, because it just doesn't perform very well yet. But it's hard to attract new users with a product that doesn't deliver all it promises.

On the bright side, the client doesn't seem to eat much RAM, so you could always install it now, go about your business and check out the search engine feature in a few weeks or months. We've got 10 invites to give away if you want to give it a try. Just be one of the first ten people to leave comment on this post. Remember, we've just got ten to give away, so if you're number 11, you're out of luck.

Update: We're all out of invites, but thanks for playing.

Filed under: P2P, Beta, Search

Faroo wants to build a better Google through peer to peer

FarooIf we've learned anything from Wikipedia and Mahalo, it's that the search engine wars aren't quite over yet. While neither site is a traditional search engine in the vein of Google, Yahoo!, or Ask, they've shown there is more than one day to index information online.

Faroo, on the other hand is developing a product that looks a lot like a typical search engine. Under the hood though, it's quite different. There's no server farm with an index and no webcrawlers. Pages are indexed via peer to peer technology. The site is launching a beta test today in conjunction with the TechCrunch40 conference.

Users install a client on their computers and it tracks websites they visit. Pages are ranked according to their popularity among users. On the one hand, this is a great way to find the most popular websites as determined by actual people. Faroo also plans to share half of its revenue with users.

On the down side, we all visit plenty of useless websites throughout the day and quickly click away. Hopefully the algorithm accounts for this.

The bigger problems are:
  1. Only pages that users visit will be indexed, so if Faroo doesn't have a large enough user base, their index will kind of stink.
  2. Isn't this just piggybacking on Google and other services? Faroo users will search for pages using old fashioned search engines, and when they click through to a result, the page will be indexed by Faroo. So how can we expect the results to be much different?
Despite our concerns, we think the idea shows promise. But we're waiting until the beta starts (later today) before we pass judgment.

Featured Time Waster

The World's Hardest Game 2.0 - Time Waster

So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do. Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game. The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...

View more Time Wasters

Featured Galleries

Defective by Design, London: Protest Pictures
Microsoft Security Essentials
Chromium Pre-Alpha on CrunchBang Linux
Safari 4 Beta
10 Firefox themes that don't suck
IE8 RC1
Download Squad at the Crunchies After-Party
Download Squad at the Crunchies
WordPress 2.7
Cooking Mama: Mama Kills Animals
Windows 7 Hands On
Comodo Internet Security
Android First-look: Amazon.com MP3 Store
Android First-look: Twitroid
Google Reader Android
Android Hands-On
Twine 1.0
Photoshop Express Beta
Mozilla Birthday Cake
Palm stuff
Adobe Lightroom 1.1

 


Follow us on Twitter!

Flickr Pool

www.flickr.com

More Tech Coverage

AOL Radio

Joystiq

TUAW

Daily Finance

Autoblog

Urlesque

Engadget

WoW

Switched.com

FanHouse