Skip to Content

Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech

book-search posts

Filed under: Internet, Microsoft, Search

Microsoft kills off book, academic search products

Live Search Books

Last year Google and Microsoft spent a lot of time trying to one up one another in the area of book search. Both companies launched products that would let users search within the text of thousands of books and display results in a web browser. Some of the books were public domain while others were copyrighted works scanned either with the consent of the copyright holders or in some cases without it. The whole thing was actually rather controversial. Except here's the thing - we're not sure either company bothered to find out if anybody was going to use the book search products.

About a year and a half after announcing the launch of its book search project, Microsoft is shutting down Live Search Books. The company is also shutting down the Live Search Academic project. Both web sites will be removed next week. Microsoft says books and academic results will be integrated into the regular search results but will no longer be indexed separately.

Microsoft digitized more than 750,000 books and 80 million journal articles over the past year or two. But the company has since had an epiphany - if you want to be in the search engine business you don't need to post content online, you just need to crawl it. So rather than continuing to scan books and articles that few people will read, Microsoft will wait for publishers to post their own content online and then scan it. We're betting Microsoft probably could have saved a lot of money if they had come to this decision a bit earlier.

Anyone want to guess how long it takes for Google to follow suit? Or is there actually a business model under which book scanning and search products actually make economic sense for Google?

[via Search Engine Land]

Filed under: Internet, Google, Microsoft, Search

Open Content Alliance takes on Microsoft and Google Book Search

Open Content AllianceSure, Google and Microsoft may talk about ambitious plans to make the full text of every book available online for searching and reading. But the New York Times reports that some major research libraries aren't happy with the terms offered by Microsoft and Google.

In the past, we'd heard a lot of complaints from book publishers who alleged that Google was violating their copyrights. But these research institutions are taking an almost opposite stance. They say they want to make sure books are available to widest possible audience. But Microsoft and Google each require publishers to promise their books won't be available through other commercial book search services.

Instead, these groups are signing up with the Open Content Alliance. The Open Content Alliance is a nonprofit group dedicated to creating a publicly accessible library of digitized books. The group was started 2 years ago. So far it looks like the OCA is a bit behind Microsoft and Google. There's no searchable OCA web site yet. But the group does offer an alternative for research institutions that aren't happy with Microsoft and Google's offerings.

While prominent libraries including the New York Public Library, Harvard, and the University of Michigan have already signed up with Google, last month 19 New England area research and academic institutions including the University of Connecticut and the University of Massachusetts announced they would work with the OCA. Those 19 institutions have a total of 34 million works whose copyrights have expired, making them ideal candidates for digitization.

The Library of Congress, the Smithsonian Institution and about 80 other organizations have already signed up with OCA.

Featured Time Waster

The World's Hardest Game 2.0 - Time Waster

So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do. Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game. The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...

View more Time Wasters

Featured Galleries

Defective by Design, London: Protest Pictures
Microsoft Security Essentials
Chromium Pre-Alpha on CrunchBang Linux
Safari 4 Beta
10 Firefox themes that don't suck
IE8 RC1
Download Squad at the Crunchies After-Party
Download Squad at the Crunchies
WordPress 2.7
Cooking Mama: Mama Kills Animals
Windows 7 Hands On
Comodo Internet Security
Android First-look: Amazon.com MP3 Store
Android First-look: Twitroid
Google Reader Android
Android Hands-On
Twine 1.0
Photoshop Express Beta
Mozilla Birthday Cake
Palm stuff
Adobe Lightroom 1.1

 


Follow us on Twitter!

Flickr Pool

www.flickr.com

More Tech Coverage

AOL Radio