Filed under: Security, Text, Web services
Send stealthy, encrypted missives via the web with Norbt
I don't often need to send ultra-secure messages to people. There's just not all that much highly-sensitive information I need to communicate. If I did, though, Norbt would be a slick way to do it.
Norbt (not to be confused with Eddie Murphy's epic film character) uses client side, browser-based cryptography to secure your transmissions. Your recipient must correctly answer the secret question. Once they do, your note is decrypted and displayed for their eyes only.
You also need to provide a password when creating your Norbt - just in case you need to go back and change some of the details.
Even if you don't have a practical reason to use a service like Norbt, it's still a fun way for you and your pals to feel like you're part of some elite spy network.
This post will self destruct in ten seconds.
Norbt (not to be confused with Eddie Murphy's epic film character) uses client side, browser-based cryptography to secure your transmissions. Your recipient must correctly answer the secret question. Once they do, your note is decrypted and displayed for their eyes only.
You also need to provide a password when creating your Norbt - just in case you need to go back and change some of the details.
Even if you don't have a practical reason to use a service like Norbt, it's still a fun way for you and your pals to feel like you're part of some elite spy network.
This post will self destruct in ten seconds.
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Cam said 12:34PM on 11-11-2009
6........5.......4........3.......2.......1...
Dangit. You exploded the internet again. Nice going.
Reply
SSG Monty said 1:14PM on 11-11-2009
That's pretty neat. I loved my spy markers.
But isn't 6 * 9 = 54, not 42. Oh well.
Reply
sitruc said 1:19PM on 11-11-2009
42 is the answer to the Ultimate Question so 6 * 9 = 42.
aragorn168b said 4:13PM on 11-11-2009
ahh already people beat me to it... its very secure 6*9 = 42, no one would think of it! :) LOL
btw, nice read. thank you.
Reply