Filed under: Features, iPhone, Mobile
CNN makes bigger mobile push with new iPhone app
Gallery: CNN iPhone App Launch
The wait for an official CNN app on your iPhone is over, and it looks like it was worth your patience. Available on the iTunes store
I spoke with CNN's Louis Gump, VP, Mobile today by phone. CNN's iPhone app takes advantage of 3.0 SDK features and is an attempt to "reinvent news applications on the iPhone". Integrating a huge library of video clips -- as well a live stream during breaking news -- directly into the app, the focus is obvious, taking CNN's global news brand and putting it just that much closer to your fingertips.
The most compelling feature, from by brieding and screen shots -- I wasn't allowed early access to the app itself -- is what Gump called, "Coverflow for news." A feature which lets users swipe through pictures and bullet points, looking for points of interest in the days popular headlines.
Positioned as a premium app, you'll have to fork over $1.99 for the goods, and tolerate just a wee bit of advertising mixed with your content. From what was relayed to me -- and I pressed -- none of the advertising sounds particularly intrusive, with a total lack of preroll video advertising, and sponsor adds appearing inline with, but visually separated from, the textual content.
Also on tap, breaking news alerts for interests you've defined, the ability to store news for later (airplane mode) and of course, social sharing on Facebook, Twitter and via email. And, when you get sick of reading the news, you can make the news -- via iReport -- with mobile uploads of video and images. "People in the field really do have access to the most compelling content, whether that be photo or video", which will be vetted as the current web version of iReport is, both by user filtering and "a small percentage" by human editors at CNN for airing on the network, or publishing on the main CNN site.
CNN was a bit coy about future plans, but said in uncertain terms, "This is not a hobby for us." Adding, "As happy as we are with this app, and we worked really hard, there is a lot more where this came from."
Asked about a possible Android or Blackberry version, "We will definitely be rolling out premium apps in the future", although Gump declined to talk specifics. "We're experimenting" said Gump, sounding like a proud father, "we're putting a lot more resources into mobile."
Update : I wasn't positive at publish time, but yes -- Push updates! More screenshots coming, now that I have my hands on the app!
Update 2: The gallery above is shots provided by CNN. The gallery below contains our first screenshots of the app in action. Take a look for more detail on how the app works and looks.
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Kevin said 11:49PM on 9-28-2009
Does the application support push notifications for story alerts and updates?
Reply
216 said 11:57PM on 9-28-2009
i was reaaaaaaaaaaaally hyped to see this...then I saw that its $1.99
Reply
Grant Robertson said 12:01AM on 9-29-2009
I sort of don't get this notion. You pay for cable, of which CNN is part, and you watch ads. Why can't the app cost a flat 1.99? That's less than a penny a day if you use it for just 7 months.
MSNBCs app is free, sure, but it's not anywhere near this good. Rachel Maddow's app is free, and yes, it contains video, but it's not *this* much content. You can't cough up 2 bucks and no subscription for live video news delivered to your phone?
sRc said 12:33AM on 9-29-2009
do you not like news reporters getting paychecks, Grant?
Grant Robertson said 12:41AM on 9-29-2009
I think you meant to direct this at the other guy, I'm the one arguing for dual revenue. ;)
Peter said 8:21AM on 9-29-2009
Grant - I think this is one of the unfortunate side effects of the FOSS software movement. It trains people that software, and to a lesser extent all intellectual property and creative arts, should be free. If a company charges for something, most of the time you can find a free alternative that does 90% of what you need. It makes it very hard for developers to make a living when people expect the fruits of their labors to be free.
That said, I do agree that $2 isn't much. The same people who bitch over paying $2 for a useful app probably waste way more money on far less useful stuff.
Grant Robertson said 8:28AM on 9-29-2009
I just spent more at Starbucks for a cup of java I'll enjoy for an hour. I think this march towards "free" is really getting out of hand. Apple developers have to eat, clothe their kids and keep a roof over their head just as much as the next guy.
Nobody questions the BMW mechanic or the plumber when he charges $110/hr to fix what ails the stuff you use everyday. But, when a rather highly skilled developer -- and believe me, iPhone is not an easy platform to develop for, although it is a slick one --wants to make a few bucks performing his craft, everyone screams bloody murder.
Frankly, the whole digital economy is getting way out of whack.
As for me, I *reviewed* this app, and I *still* paid for it. Out of my own pocket. $2 to add a ton more compelling content to my iPod Touch was a total no-brainer. In fact, if they'd make an Android app, I'd buy it for my ADP (3G MyTouch) too.
scott said 5:16AM on 9-29-2009
Doesn't seem to be available in all stores. Seems a common newbie mistake that US content providers CNN, Etrade, Mint, etc think that there apps should only be published in/restricted to the US itunes store.
Reply
dzerveviktory said 3:25AM on 10-04-2009
i dont mind shelling out the 1.99 but is it really worth it? Dont want to spend the $2 and then be completely disappointed....
Reply