Filed under: Internet, Video, Web
Hulu working on a subscription-based video service
Over the past year or so Hulu has quickly become one of the most popular online video sites even though it's only open to US viewers. Hulu's success likely comes from a number of factors including a focus on high quality professionally produced content including network TV shows and movies, a simple user interface, and relatively unobtrusive advertisements that are much easier to put up with than the 18 minutes of ads in every hour of US broadcast television.
But Hulu's focus on advertising supported content has likely prevented some premium content owners like HBO and Showtime from making full length content available. Now it looks like Hulu is testing out a subscription-based service.
I really hope any subscription service would offer content that's not currently available to Hulu customers. I'd hate to see some of the content that's currently available for free disappear behind a paywall. But at this point it's too early to say exactly what the service will look like, or even it will ever appear.
[via Business Insider]
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
W.Wolf said 11:42AM on 9-18-2009
If they do make us pay for HBO, Showtime etc., I hope they lets us choose individual channels to pay for and not act like Comcast and make us pay for all of them even if we only want to watch one of them.
Reply
Todd said 11:47AM on 9-18-2009
"...I'd hate to see some of the content that's currently available for free disappear behind a paywall."
If they're smart ( and remember this is a bunch of old dinosaur TV execs ) the big divide will be:
1 - image resolution ( free is low res, pay is full blown 1080p )
and/or
2 - Cut deals with one or more of the set top boxes, IPTV channels like U-Verse.
But not mentioned in this post are all the SAG union entanglements. Reminder, hulu has dodged an epic lawsuit from actors, writers and directors only because hulu is free to use. Change it to pay and hell is gonna break loose over residuals.
Reply
W.Wolf said 11:55AM on 9-18-2009
I should probably ask if I have to pay for it does that mean the advertisements go away? I mean all of them, banner and standard TV style ads.
Reply
Jeff said 1:44PM on 9-25-2009
W.Wolf nailed it. Paid content should be advertisement free.
And to add to Todd's thoughts, I'd rather they offer up micropayment plans so I can pay to see the one good movie/show HBO is showing this month and not pay for the other crap they spin up.
Reply
Jamus said 12:04PM on 9-18-2009
Here we go down the greed road again. I am betting they they would force a bundle on subscribers. Or maybe not "force", but something like pricing it so 1 channel of HBO is $9.99 a month or you can get all 6 for $10.99.
Reply
darrenryall said 12:58PM on 9-18-2009
Access outside the US? No?
Took too long, not listening!
Let the rest of the world know when Hulu and others like Pandora finally open up, until then we'll be at places like Last.fm or Grooveshark.
Reply
Michael said 8:54PM on 9-18-2009
You let me know when spotify opens up. Until then I'll be on pandora.
Thanks.
Rocket Raccoon said 8:13AM on 9-20-2009
I was going to comment about this very thing. I don't mind watching commercials first. Hell, I'd watch twice as many commercials if I needed to. There aren't any borders on the internet, let me watch the videos!