Filed under: Mozilla, Browsers
Mozilla prompts Firefox 3 users to upgrade to 3.5
So it shouldn't be too surprising that Mozilla recently started sending notices to Firefox 3.0.13 users suggesting they update to Firefox 3.5, or version 3.5.2 to be exact. Users who want to hold off can hit decide to hold off on upgrading until later or click the "never" button if 2008 was a good year and one that they don't ever want to leave. Or you can upgrade from within the browser.
Mozilla says more than 90% of the add-ons that were built for Firefox 3.0 have been updated to work in Firefox 3.5. But if you happen to have a few plugins installed that don't have newer versions, the update notice will alert you to this fact. So if there actually is a good reason for not upgrading, you'll know.
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Gary said 4:04PM on 8-17-2009
I'm worried that if I upgrade Firefox, I will be forced to upgrade my Stylish extension to the new version that no one likes. it's not just that I hate the new UI and wold miss the removed features. Some people are also complaining that their custom style sheets don't work in the new version; so I don't want to risk having to rewrite the style sheets I've written for nearly 200 sites and adapted for three different screen sizes and resolutions..
Reply
stevensnewest said 10:30PM on 8-17-2009
As long as that "low memory" bug continues to plague Firefox 3.5, I'm not upgrading at all.
Reply
Karl said 7:54AM on 8-18-2009
Twice as fast as 3.0? Who the **** are they kidding??
Reply