Filed under: OS Updates, Windows, Macintosh, Apple, Microsoft
No coupon for you, new Mac buyer! Snow Leopard upgrade costs $9.95
Remeber the announcement last week that Windows 7 upgrade coupon plans are falling into place? Buy a machine with Windows Vista within the specified window, and you'll get a voucher for a free, spankin' new Windows 7.What about Apple hardware currently sporting Leopard? Snow Leopard is due soon, after all. So will you get a free upgrade?
Not so much.
It'll cost you $9.95 - not a huge premium, obviously, but it's still more than free. While I'm not an Apple user and not in the market for a new notebook anyway, that offer stinks.
Leopard to Snow Leopard isn't quite the same evolutionary step as Vista is to Windows 7, but that upgrade won't cost a cent? I like the sound of that much better.
Will the fee hurt Apple sales? Likely not. Most consumers probably either won't bother with the update or won't think twice about shelling out ten bucks to get current. But can you imagine the crap storm that would ensue if Microsoft was to pull that when transitioning from one OS to another?
We'd never hear the end of it.
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
robotrock said 4:09PM on 6-16-2009
They like to do these weird smallish fees on people - like the one to unlock 802.11n on earlier MBPs.
That said...Microsoft should give every Vista owner an upgrade for 10 bucks.
Reply
JB said 6:25PM on 6-16-2009
Microsoft IS charging $10 for the upgrade... It's just most likely being subsidized by the vendor.
In the case of Snow Leopard, Apple IS the vendor... they're not going to subsidize themselves now are they?
Chris Stott said 4:20PM on 6-16-2009
This probably comes under the same sphere as paying for iPod touch OS upgrades vs getting them for free on the iPhone. Accountancy rules.
It was the same thing for iLife too.
http://www.macworld.com/article/131991/2008/02/ipodtouch.html
Reply
playstation_1987 said 4:30PM on 6-16-2009
If it was accounting rules why does Microsoft give away Windows 7 Coupons to those who buy Windows Vista laptops after July? I'm not even a Mac fanboi but there is no reason they have to charge for Snow Leopard upgrades if you buy a brand new notebook right now. What accounting rule specifically states you have to make people pay for upgrades? iPhone users get free upgrades but iPod touch users don't? Blu-Ray players give free firmware upgrades.
Andreas said 4:35PM on 6-16-2009
Sarcasm? :s.
"Leopard to Snow Leopard isn't quite the same evolutionary step as Vista is to Windows 7"
I admit i haven't kept myself entirely up to date with all the new features in Win 7 but exactly which features are you referring too, to me Win 7 looks like a polished version of Vista?
I admit $10 is kinda an unnecessary fee but as I've understood you get upgrade DVD's for that and not just some install file?
Not to mention the initial cost of actually buying Vista which is roughly $210 in Sweden atm, almost 2x the initial cost of buying leopard?
Reply
disco said 4:47PM on 6-16-2009
I think one of the reasons that M$ is giving away Windows 7 is cause Vista is a disaster and they want to move away from it as quickly as possible. And you are right, it would be a crap storm because Vista was a dud. I think if Vista rocked the show, Windows 7 wouldn't be. Perhaps it would come as a service pack or something along those lines.
./disco
Reply
Quikboy said 11:49PM on 6-16-2009
I would agree that Windows Vista when launched, was not quite up to par, but with SP1 and now SP2, Windows Vista is running and operating fine as many users have noticed.
No need for the ridiculous '$'!
disco said 12:37PM on 6-17-2009
Consider this, M$ released XP in 2001
Vista, the successor to XP was released to Retail Customers in Jan, 2007.
Windows 7 is to be released in approx Sept, 2009.
Don't you think its odd that XP lasted about 5 - 6 years and Vista barely makes it to 3 years? M$ realized they need to dump this albatross and move on, Windows 7 is what Vista should have been. Cheers,
disco
devildog820 said 4:38PM on 6-16-2009
Actually, when I got my free Vista upgrade from Dell a couple of years ago, I had to pay $20 in shipping and handling to get my free upgrade. So, really, Apple undercut MS on this too...
Reply
Licotto said 5:47PM on 6-16-2009
I'm confused...isn't the Snow Leopard upgrade $29, not $9.95??? Even on the link above (Apple announces price and date for Mac OS X Snow Leopard) states it as $29...
Did I miss something?
Reply
Lee Mathews said 5:48PM on 6-16-2009
This is on new hardware purchase during an "upgrade window." IE systems that are in stores, but have Leopard installed on them.
Reply
Arturo said 6:09PM on 6-16-2009
dude, 10 bucks is NOT the end of the world. If anyone is going to be affected by this, itd be Apple, if customers are at all swayed for the PC choice because of the upgrade fee on the mac....
Reply
Lee Mathews said 7:04PM on 6-16-2009
Whoa, wasn't aware I equated it to 'the end of the world'
Arturo said 7:11PM on 6-16-2009
you know what I mean... were it more money, I think it be a valid point. Didnt mean to sound harsh, it was just a hyperbole...:p
Slappy said 7:08PM on 6-16-2009
Ummm...the upgrade is free, there's a shipping and handling charge.
"Those who have recently purchased Macs won't have to continue cursing at themselves for not putting it off until after Snow Leopard is released later this year. Apple has published info on its Snow Leopard Up-to-Date program, which details how qualifying Mac owners can get a copy of Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) for free—plus $9.95 shipping and handling, of course."
Reply
Lee Mathews said 7:16PM on 6-16-2009
Not what it says on the Apple site:
"...can upgrade to Snow Leopard for US$9.95 plus tax"
Shipping is included in the cost, which makes sense. What's shipping on a sleeved DVD? $1?
kevinn said 9:48PM on 6-16-2009
Anyone who bought a Mac within the cutoff date (June 8th) are qualified to the upgrade program. The $10 bucks is just for S&H of the DVD to you when Snow Leopard ships.
For older Mac Leopard users, its $30 for upgrading to the same thing.
Reply
jonathan.riggall said 7:36AM on 6-17-2009
But you wouldn't lose out continuing with Leopard, which is still great, and $10 is a very moderate price for an upgrade.
Microsoft may well have got more stick for something like this, but their products aren't as smooth, and so don't generate that warm happy feeling that Apple's do. I'm AMAZED I only have to pay $30 to upgrade to Snow Leopard.
Especially as I know that from day one it will work without problems.
Reply
Fromamac said 8:32AM on 6-17-2009
Thats because most Mac fans don't care how much it cost to buy second-tier hardware...so why care if your buying a Service Pack??? LuLz
Reply
Jeffrey said 4:07PM on 6-18-2009
I don't see the problem. If I buy a new Mac *right now*, I can get Snow Leopard for just $9.95 once it's released later this year, rather than the $29 full price for everyone else. Otherwise, I can wait to buy the Mac once it's released and get it for free. It's not complicated and it's not a trick.
It's a different way of doing business than the M$ status quo, with its tiered versions of Windows, all exorbitantly priced. Besides, whether from buying a new computer where it's subsidized by the manufacturer, snagging an OEM version at a computer swap meet, copying from a friend or a bootleg copy online, how many Windows users actually pay full price?
Reply