Filed under: Internet, Video, Web
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Advertise with Download Squad. (Learn more)
| # | Blogger | Posts | Cmts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jay Hathaway | 105 | 5 |
| 2 | Lee Mathews | 74 | 20 |
| 3 | Sebastian Anthony | 67 | 239 |
| 4 | Brad Linder | 35 | 2 |
| 5 | Jason Clarke | 27 | 0 |
| 6 | Paul O'Brien | 8 | 0 |
| 7 | Grant Robertson | 6 | 3 |
| 8 | Dolores Parker | 6 | 2 |
| 9 | Victor Agreda, Jr. | 5 | 1 |
| 10 | Nik Fletcher | 5 | 0 |
| 11 | Matt Heerema | 3 | 0 |
| 12 | John Burke | 2 | 0 |
| 13 | Download Squad Staff | 1 | 0 |
cloud google chat twitter browsers facebook TimeWaster firefox privacy Windows7 false SnowLeopard windows-7 add-ons android photoshop music webkit mobile userscripts game online-video time-waster iphone games free gmail AppStore microsoft security mac features linux video amazon GoogleChrome antivirus advertising search opera google-chrome apps malware wave Beta Tumblr chromium SocialNetworking rss OsX
All contents copyright © 2003-2009, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
Download Squad is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
darome said 4:50PM on 6-03-2009
Ha!! Dream along with me!!! Hulu is nice but not great!! I doubt if anybody would pay for those programs unless them would keep them on their servers for a longer time than they do now. All you get now is old old versions and the latest for about two weeks after it comes out. A real drag! Why pay for Hulu when you can go to OVGUIDE and get almost anything at anytime???? You would have to significantly improve the program base if you wanted to charge anything for the service. Subscription services are a way of the past in almost every field , better to monitorize with advertising. When will those fat cats realize that they can't get money out of us simple Joe's to support their company jets!
Reply
alex1jam said 4:17PM on 6-03-2009
This is why Google's Youtube is the best. I mean they also have TV shows now so this is good down with that other site and come on Youtube your the best.
Reply
What the Frack?! said 4:59PM on 6-03-2009
I would go back to downloading them from other places...
Reply
Rahabib said 5:19PM on 6-03-2009
I would never pay for hulu. Its the only reason I go there.
Reply
Jon said 5:58PM on 6-03-2009
Try it ... And ill be sailing on a Pirate ship
Reply
Kate said 10:07PM on 6-03-2009
I wouldn't pay for Hulu. Torrents again I guess.
Reply
Quikboy said 9:45PM on 6-03-2009
I think instead, Hulu should have "Pro" accounts, where users the go for this account, can have special access to goodies like no ads, more advance player features (like bookmarking a spot?), and maybe even a certain number of downloads. Hopefully, the Pro accounts are at a good price that will entice users to go for it, and help cover production costs for the content.
Reply
Gobelet said 10:08PM on 6-03-2009
I. Would. Pay. If I could access it from outside the US!
Reply
Eroded Fallacy said 8:23AM on 6-04-2009
Like if i don't already pay for other things.... this is a luxury i can certainly do without should it be paid subscription.
Reply
Mimzy said 9:11AM on 6-04-2009
Great. I finally found an awesome site where I can watch a wide variety of content with a few ads here and there, and it too will soon start demanding my money.
Yay BitTorrent.
Reply
Josh said 10:12AM on 6-04-2009
Only reason I would pay is if they made the entire catalog of each show available. Not just this 5 latest show crap.
Reply