Pirates abandon ship as IPRED law kicks in
It's no secret that P2P traffic makes up a huge percentage of the total traffic on the Internet. Also no secret is that fact that some portion of that traffic is used for nefarious purposes like downloading movies that haven't been released or software that Microsoft doesn't want you to have yet.Yesterday, the IPRED era was ushered in for Swedes, and an incredible 33% drop in Internet traffic followed. The vice-chair of Sweden's Pirate Party, Chrisitian Engstrom, said the decrease was a direct result of the new law.
Under IPRED's provisions, service providers can now be ordered by the court to turn over detailed information about traffic to a user's IP address. It remains to be seen whether or not the logs will be enough to be constitute sufficient proof for charges laid against file sharers.
It's an obvious scare tactic, but one that has proved effective for now. Even if only 1,000 of Sweden's 2 million-plus file sharers are prosecuted (as Engstrom proposes), that may not be a gamble the average downloader wants to take.
The P2P community has historically come up with ways around this kind of "annoyance." PirateBay's Ipredator service is coming, and may provide users with a simple and inexpensive way to avoid logging.
Get a WordPress.com Blog
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
r3loaded said 1:16PM on 4-02-2009
"It remains to be seen whether or not the logs will be enough to be constitute sufficient proof for charges laid against file sharers." - nope, it STILL isn't definite proof. They might be able to prove the data came from their connection, but can't prove whether it was them sitting at their computer, or whether it was even their computer (e.g. someone could have broke into their wireless network).
Reply
edward said 2:12PM on 4-02-2009
Nope. If I am not doing anything wrong then they are not going to find evidence of wrong doing. (I hope)
Reply
numerwan said 2:06PM on 4-02-2009
Unforunately, the idea of being anonymous on the web is dead... In the US, the privacy act is dead... so many loopholes, even taking a dump in your own bathroom is probably monitored...
It's only a matter of time till someone comes up with something that will truly make you anonymous on the web... Till then, its either temporarily conform, or say screw it and run with it...
Reply
mko said 2:16PM on 4-02-2009
Hmm I thought file sharing was not a prosecutable act in Sweden (or anywhere else in continental Europe)
Reply
Dwight Stegall said 10:26AM on 4-03-2009
The average person only steals because it's illegal. It's just an act of defiance.
Reply
Nypheria said 3:53PM on 4-06-2009
Umm no. The average person downloads illegally because they cannot afford it. It has NOTHING to do with defiance.