Filed under: Internet, Video, Google
Should Google execs be held responsible for illegal video uploads?
This isn't the first time that Google has faced pressure because of videos that were illegally uploaded to Google Video or YouTube. But this time we're not talking about copyrighted music videos or movies. The video in question shows four kids harassing a boy with Down Syndrome. Google removed the video after receiving a complaint. But Italian authorities filed criminal charges of defamation and violation or privacy.
The case seems a bit ridiculous. On the one hand, it's horrible that people would make videos of offensive content and upload it to a site like Google Video. On the other, should Google be held responsible, or should the kids who created the video?
What do you think? Is this like suing paper manufacturers for creating a product that can be used to send death threats and ransom letters? Or is it different because Google could theoretically exert more control over the content that's uploaded to its servers?

So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Xerloq said 12:25PM on 2-03-2009
No they shouldn't be held responsible, anymore than the ISP is that delivered it, or the computer manufacturers who "allowed" the content to be displayed on Italian users machines.
Only the user who created the content should be responsible.
Reply
Juliana Peña said 12:55PM on 2-03-2009
If Google moderated every single video before posting it, it would take ages and a ridiculous amount of manpower. Last I hear, 3 hours of video are uploaded every second to YouTube. With these numbers, moderation would take so long that it would cripple the service.
Instead, Google, and other owners of user-created content websites, expect the users to moderate themselves by giving them the option of "reporting" a video or other content. And of course, there are Google employees that moderate the content *after* it is posted.
Let's not cripple the service. YouTube is awesome because it lets us post videos immediately and lets us watch the latest videos. My applying pre-posting moderation, this feature would be gone.
I'm sorry for the boy who had to suffer through this. Something simmilar happened a couple of years ago at a local school, and nobody ever sued YouTube. Instead, they punished the bullies who posted the video and made them take it down themselves.
Reply
Eli Gundry said 6:39PM on 2-03-2009
Your absolutely correct. Another example of what your talking about (kind of) is Star Wars kid. After that video got posted, he had some serious mental problems. Did he ever file suit against YouTube? No.
a said 1:21PM on 2-03-2009
It's the same question as "should Walmart be held responsible for selling knives."
The kids could've harassed or bullied any other way and Google shouldn't have anything to do with it.
Reply
bobbywigs said 1:22PM on 2-03-2009
lawyers will sue anything remotely linked to a case. debating the common-sense merits of such things is usually pointless.
Reply
Alan Williamson said 1:22PM on 2-03-2009
There are a number of issues at play here that could really set a major trend if we are not careful. Picture of you will the executives being convicted and then having a warrant issued for their arrest. Will the Italian government ask the US government to hand them over? Will the US government do so? What does this mean for other US companies operating within Italian? Will Italy suddenly become a no-go-zone?
I am glad the Italians choose to fight Google on this and not a smaller player. Google has the deep deep deep legal pockets to fight this and hopefully win. If anything its a fight for common sense.
The bullies in question have been since disciplined, so really, what is the Italian authorities hoping to gain here?
Reply
richard said 1:33PM on 2-03-2009
clearly it is the makers and uploaders of the video who are in the wrong here, any court should be able to conclude that. Google can't be expected to moderate every single video that gets uploaded, nor should they be held responsible for a video made by a group of bullies.
Reply
Jack said 1:39PM on 2-03-2009
That's ridiculous. Google shouldn't be held responsible for the content created by a user which was uploaded onto their site. If Google moderated absolutely everything that was uploaded to Google Video/Youtube all the time, it would be crazy.
Reply
Ridgecity said 1:47PM on 2-03-2009
Italia is such a corrupt country than this is obviously a case to leech money from Google, now that their economy is on brink of collapse, maybe they should start educating their youth so they don't harass other people, which is alarming considering their statistics says than 1 in every 2 men are gay, can't imagine what kind of life these guys get over there...
Reply
Jeff Yablon said 2:13PM on 2-03-2009
Not illegal in the US . . . probably . . . as we seem to work on the notion that being a step or two removed provides insulation as long as you act responsibly when faced with the bad stuff you are attached to.
In Europe, on the other hand, the rules are different. BAsically, everyone is responsible for everyone.
It is what it is . . .
Jeff Yablon
Virtual VIP
Reply
Leisureguy said 3:07PM on 2-03-2009
Sure they should. And shoe store owners should be held liable if someone robs a bank wearing shoes that they bought in the store.
Reply
boogster1 said 7:39AM on 2-04-2009
Google is going EXTREMELY too far on being too accurate to spot an inappropriate video. I wish they'd calm down...a lot
Reply