Filed under: Features, Windows, Macintosh, Apple, Microsoft
Installing Windows 7 on a Mac
We're pretty excited about Windows 7, and we know that users are too. After all, with any luck, Windows 7 will be what Vista was supposed to be. Lee has done a bang-up job covering Windows 7 tips and tricks for PC users, but Mac users who use Windows for work or for compatibility testing don't have to be left out. Hey, I might not ever switch back to using a PC full time (and I'm certainly not going to buy a laptop that doesn't have the word "Mac" in it), but that doesn't mean that I'm uninterested or unexcited about Windows 7.
Although Intel Macs can run Windows 7 in Boot Camp, for most users, the easiest and most hassle-free method will be to use virtualization. This way, you can test out all the features of Windows 7, without having to dual-boot. The big pitfall for virtualization: gaming and HD-video playback, are less an issue in Windows 7 because those areas are still being tweaked and aren't ready for prime time anyway.
The three big players out there for virtualization on the Mac are:
I've installed Windows 7 in the latest version of each program and tweaked the settings to get the best results.
Here are some overall settings to keep in mind:
- You'll want to dedicate at least 1 GB of RAM to Windows 7 Beta
- For best performance on your Mac, it helps to have at least 2 GB of RAM dedicated to OS X, so that puts total RAM in the 3 GB and up range.
- Reserve about 40 GB of HD space for your virtual machine installation. If you don't have the space on an internal drive, you can use an external drive without a problem (that's what I do)
- Disable 3-D graphics support, as it really isn't working in any of the virtualization programs right now and can be buggy
VMWare Fusion 2.0
VMWare Fusion doesn't officially support Windows 7. But it installs just fine -- even in Unity mode! Note, I used VMWare Fusion 2.0.1, but I've read reports that VMWare Fusion 1.1.3 works with Windows 7 as well. Unity might not work correctly, but everything else should be OK. Upgrading to 2.0 is free for 1.0 customers, so if you haven't already upgraded, you might want to take the plunge. Fusion 2.0 has some great features and it really is worth the upgrade.
Tips and Tricks:
- Remember to use Windows Server 2008 or Windows Server 2008 64-bit as the OS of choice. Easy Install works just fine as long as Windows Server 2008 is what you pick.
- Disable shared folders. There is currently a permissions issue so it's just best to disable it. This means mirrored folders won't work and shared applications might be buggy.
- Again, disable 3D graphics because this causes some conflicts with certain DirectX appications
Check out the gallery for the full installation guide:
Gallery: Windows 7 in VMWare Fusion 2
Additional thoughts:
- VMWare Fusion 2.0 was the only program that performed a true "auto-install." This means you insert the activation code in a dialog box before the installation begins and everything is pre-configured, so you can actually just step away for a few minutes and come back to a Windows 7 virtual machine.
- This also means it automatically installs VMWare Tools, which while not specifically designed for Windows 7, do stuff like enable audio and video drivers so you can resize the screen at ease, use Unity and listen to music.
- Performance was solid, but more akin to running Vista rather than running XP.
- Unity mode works, but can slow down the system. If you don't have at least 4 GB of RAM, use Windowed mode instead.
Parallels 4.0
The latest 4.0.3810 (released today) will automatically recognize and configure Windows 7. Previous Paralells 4 builds do work with Windows 7, but the new version supports Coherence Mode and performed better in my tests.
Check out the gallery for the full installation guide:
Gallery: Windows 7 in Parallels 4
Additional Thoughts:
- Remember to install your Parallels Tools. Both in the previous 4.0 release and in 4.0.3810, the Parallels Tools installation hung and needed to be aborted. However, in both cases, after restarting the virtual machine (which coincided with the installation of the latest Windows 7 updates), the Tools were installed and working properly.
- The latest version supports Coherence and was pretty zippy.
- The auto-configuration of the VM was also a nice touch, though you still need to manually go through the entire Windows 7 installation. In my tests, the latest build of Parallels 4 had the best performance with Windows 7 on my machine.
- All forum accounts say that Windows 7 will NOT run well under Parallels 3.0
VirtualBox 2.1.2
VirtualBox is favorite for several of my fellow-Download Squad bloggers because it is free and is becoming fairly robust. The latest build, 2.1.2, even supports Windows 7 as a guest OS out of the gate.
Tips and Tricks:
- Remember to allocate 1 GB of memory to Windows 7. VirtualBox defaults to 512, but that really isn't enough.
- Additionally, VirtualBox recommends 20 GB of space for the virtual machine but 40 is really better. You can create an expanding drive, so only what you use now is taken up, but let the system have some room to breathe.
Check out the gallery for the full installation guide:
Gallery: Windows 7 in VirtualBox
Additional thoughts:
- The virtual machine creation process isn't as streamlined as Fusion or Parallels. I'm not saying it is hard to figure out, it's just clunky.
- By default, audio and USB support are disabled. After you install Windows 7, you'll need to manually enable them in VirtualBox's settings.
- Despite support for guest tools (VirtualBox's version of Parallels or VMWare Tools), resizing Windows 7's window is still a bit slower than the other two programs.
- Overall performance was a bit lower in VirtualBox than the other two programs, at least in my tests.
- There's no Unity or Coherence mode, you have to run VirtualBox either in a full screen or in a smaller sized screen on your computer. As the comments pointed out, VirtualBox does have a Seamless mode, I just checked it and it works. Not as slick as the other two programs, but it exists! Thanks!
With Halloween fast approaching, it's a great time to get in some practice defending your territory against zombies. In Graveyard Shift, you take aim at zombies and other creepy-crawlies, blasting them into splatters of cartoony green guts. It's a casual first-person shooter, and it's very easy to get the hang of - use the mouse to aim, click to fire. Graveyard Shift has at least 15 levels, and it might even have some secret stages I haven't unlocked yet.
They key to getting good at Graveyard Shift is learning to use ...

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Muffin_man said 7:13PM on 1-23-2009
This doesn't seem like a good combo to me. Mac sells overpriced hardware and MS sells overpriced software. They don't seem like a fitting couple.
Then again this is the free beta.
Reply
Christina Warren said 7:28PM on 1-23-2009
Heh, well, free is part of why it's fun. Other than the Mac mini, which is insanely overpriced for its specs, Mac hardware is about on-par with any other manufacturer...and you tend to get better quality components. So it's all a tradeoff, but you aren't getting screwed if you are buying for quality.
Brian! said 4:25AM on 1-24-2009
Wait, I'm sorry. Apple hardware is on-par price wise with PC computers and better components? No way. That is just not true.
There are soooo many different PC brands that sell the same raw part configuration of an Apple computer for less than the Apple sticker. Once you break open that Mac, the inside core components are not superior to a PC. Intel is intel, NVidia is Nvidia, etc... Apple sources their stuff from the same place many PC makers do to. It isn't like they put magic dust on their hard drives to prevent them from crashing any more than another drive out there.
Now, design, flare, a sense of being part of a member's only club. That Apple has in spades. Apple does deliver on the pretty. But I can hit a Frys and build out a computer to run circles around a $4000+ mac for less than $2000. It might not look as pretty, but it will be fast.
Other than looks, Apple gives you a great OS. Why in the world do you all want to put Windows 7 on your pretty macs?! Is it a chance to get up to speed for the MS bashing that will come?
I am a computer is a computer guy. I could give a crap what machine I use as long as it does the job. But as a graphic artist I have lots of friends who preach to me the Steve Job's gospel. Yet they too seem to show off how their macs run Windows so well. All the while telling me how they think the OS sucks, how they have all the apps they need on their mac and the windows only apps are not worth their time anyway. How all the good games are on Mac too. And how their hardware is just as good for the price they spent as any PC - or better.
And so I find it incredibly funny to see Apple hardware owners shoving beta Windows 7 on their Macs. God help us if MS actually pulls it off and makes Windows 7 more enticing than OS X in visuals and functionality.
I wonder with all the Apple marketing out there if they have somehow tricked the public into thinking Apple makes the leading OS now. And now MS is some kind of underdog in the OS race. Is the desire to get Windows 7 up and running on the Mac a secret desire to root for the underdog?
brian said 2:30PM on 2-12-2009
Well said....you just stole my words...
But at the end of the end...Mac still makes great computers....but for MS...not sure...somehow "Microsoft makes good software" doesn't quite sound right.
http://www.livbit.com
smoodin said 7:54PM on 1-23-2009
what about seamless mode in VirtualBox?
Reply
Isaiah said 8:03PM on 1-23-2009
Thanks, I've been meaning to install 7 on my MacPro, but I've been a bit hesitant at what crap I'd have to work through to make it happen. Thanks for doing the dirty work for us.
I guess it's time to upgrade my copy of Fusion and just do it.
Isaiah
Reply
Slaughter said 9:52PM on 1-23-2009
I installed Win 7 on my MBP with Bootcamp. The only problems that I have experienced were with sound, but that was an easy fix. I just Googled "Win 7 Beta Mac sound" and I ran across a page which told me exactly how to fix it. The only other problem I am having is that I cant see the preview windows when things are minimized, but I think its a video card issue. I tried upgrading my video driver, but that screwed things up and I had to roll back the driver. Overall, it is MUCH better than Vista, but I still will not use Windows 7 as my primary OS, I will stick with OS X and wait for Snow Leopard to upgrade my OS.
Reply
Michael said 11:03PM on 1-23-2009
Which program allows you to run your VM off an external drive? It doesn't appear that Fusion does...
Reply
Christina Warren said 3:44PM on 1-24-2009
It does. You just need to select your external drive as your location when you create you VM. It'll default to the internal drive, just change the location (click "more details or something in the second or third step of the set-up) and designate the drive you want to use.
All of the programs will let you run a VM on an external drive. Even on USB 2, the difference in access speed isn't distinguishable. Use FW or eSATA and you'll have even better results.
Mark said 11:13PM on 1-23-2009
I installed the Windows 7 beta via VMware Fusion 2 on my unibody MacBook Pro and was impressed with the install process, it went very smooth. Once Windows has fully booted up things seem to run well but while it's booting up (which takes a link time as a VM) my mac is super slow.
One big thing you should realize before doing this is you will not get the fancy new taskbar features everyone has been raving about. VMware doesn't support the Areo interface which means you won't get the cool "aero peek" previews of the windows when mousing over the taskbar, nor will you get the preview thumbnails, both of which are a huge bummer not to have. When you mouse over an open program, you get a list of the currently open windows (similar to the expanded "grouped" taskbar items in XP) and hovering over the list items does nothing special.
Aside from the disappointment in not having Aero, I think Windows 7 looks pretty good. Finally some good competition again for OS X.
Reply
Beanie said 11:56PM on 1-23-2009
I installed Windows 7 via Bootcamp on my Late 2008 Unibody 2.8 MBP. It worked perfectly. I don't know what you mean about it not being ready for games... it runs Team Fortress 2 beautifully at native resolution and with all the settings on high. It sure is perty.
Reply
Harrison said 1:03AM on 1-24-2009
Goodness I despise Mac people. Your ridiculous devotion to a corporation is just an example of your ignorance. Saying things like "I'm certainly not going to buy a laptop that doesn't have the word 'Mac' in it" are just stupid. If Mac goes under or goes to crap in quality like Dell Laptops did years ago, will you still be as ignorantly devoted to a flipping name? Half the reason our country is where it is right now, is because giant corporations obliterated small mom-and-pop competition, and then collapsed under their own weight by not being able to manage themselves right. (Think CompUSA, Circuit City, etc.) If you enjoy your tech, awesome, but don't be a royal dill-weed and swear allegiance to a freaking corporation. But then I am preaching to a bunch of people who are just going to hate mail me all night long, aren't I?
Reply
THJ said 9:09AM on 1-24-2009
New and Original! No dead horse being beaten here!
TKO said 2:08AM on 1-24-2009
@harrison ..Dude, it's just a computer brand. No need to pretend it's a religious war.
Um, please explain what Apple has to do with the obliteration of Mom&Pop corporations? Are you just picking on others now Bush isn't available to blame?
If you'd been using and supporting WinXP, Vista, and Mac machines for several years now, you'd probably feel much more comfortable with the clean-ness of MacOS compared to the too-many-cooks-in-the-kitchen Windows flavours. Apple machines really aren't the pure evil you paint them to be.
Disclaimer: Both my home machines are PC's ..but I have an iPhone and am seriously considering a MacMini for development soon.
Reply
Harrison said 2:24AM on 1-24-2009
Hmmm...I didn't intend to make it out to be such a "religious war." The point I was trying to convey is that Apple is a company just like any other, and so many people act like it (Apple) is the first, last and only way to do tech.
I was just really annoyed with the author's line about NEVER buying a competing brand of laptop again. That to me is just flat stupid. (And a very, very common opinion--shared by a vast majority of the Apple users I have met.) Dell built it's reputation on quality then lost it. What makes anybody so sure that Apple will NEVER pull a similar stunt? Steve Jobs announces a leave of absence and Apple's stocks plummet. There is no reason to think that Apple will or ever should be the end all for ANYTHING. No company should.
Where did Bush come into the question? I didn't much care for the guy, and I don't think he had a single thing to do with computers...He probably never learned how to turn one on--I don't know or care. This is a tech blog site, not the Economist.
If you read what I said, I never dissed on Apple's designs or software. I diss the (majority of the) lame-ass people that use them, and then set up Apple shrines in their heads. They simply cannot fathom that perhaps somebody else could do something as well as or better than their beloved fruity friend, which is annoying to me.
TKO said 3:18AM on 1-24-2009
Apple have always been a 'premier' hardware maker ..putting design and usability before the bottom-line ..apart from 'the dark years', they don't do cheap. People who love this concept will naturally gravitate towards Apple because, hell, who else in tech does this? You see the same kind of brand loyalty in cars, clothing, mountain-bikes, etc. If there were more tech companies consistently doing this I'm sure Apple wouldn't be the only one receiving this kind of adoration. ..Sony was maybe in this class once. But IMHO recent console, display, and PC build-quality is suffering now.
Think you're reading too much into her comments dude. She said she *might* not go back to using a PC full-time (there, still open to windows) and is *certainly* not going back to something without Mac on it which, sure, if you want to take it literally sounds like she's married to Mac hardware ..but I think it's reasonable to assume that, if Apple hardware goes to crap like it did in the first sans-Steve era, she'll have the intelligence to re-evaluate her position. (Feel free to shoot her down if she doesn't though.) :) For now, it was just a one sentence. Don't consider it her mantra for life.)
Um, you did seem to be suggesting apple as one of the big corporations who killed the mom&pop stores. If I have to draw you a picture when bringing Bush into the big corporation argument, this is gonna take a real long time. C'mon! I put the words mom&pop and Bush in two connecting sentences!
Christina Warren said 11:41AM on 1-24-2009
TKO - you pretty much understood my comment. Right now, Apple makes the best hardware (Lenovo makes nice stuff too but it isn't any cheaper and doesn't come with OS X) and they couple that with an OS that I prefer for both my inner design geek and my UNIX geek. Having said that, if Apple flipped course and went the way of Dell and coupled crappy hardware with an OS I don't like as much, sure I'd ammend that "never buy a laptop without Mac in it" statement.
Honestly, I like Windows 7. I might even dual-boot it if I end up finding apps or another reason to do so.
I'm not a zealot; I was trying to be cheeky. Trust me, I respect other OSs and I'm a computer fan. It is fun to play with new stuff, regardless of platform. I do like that my Mac lets me do that without having to go all osx86.
TKO said 10:19PM on 1-25-2009
Comment by a female! What to do? What to do?!
hehe.. Sorry, couldn't resist. :) (I could claim to not be a geek at this point, but heck, I just used html braces.)
A few years ago, in the PowerPC days, when the motherboard+CPU architecture wasn't being done by people (IMHO) as professional as Intel, and back when the cases were plastic (durable though it may be), and every second power-brick design had cables that frayed at the brick or plug, I too might have queried your wish to specifically go for a Mac Christina.
But now they've got such cool hardware (the Intel architecture + the unibody, the no-ugly-button glass trackpad, the glass screen, and light-up keys) and are truly becoming the centre of people's digital lifestyle (in seriously good ways ..I mean, look at iPhoto and iMovie now ..and then contrast with you're typical (disjoint) windows software bundled with Cameras) ..now that it's got to this stage, it's much easier to understand the desire to stay mac. I'd love to have a unibody mac myself, but I just can't justify it. Even either of the built-in battery models appeal. That's a ballsy move at the premium ends of the market.
Those who instantly assume a mac-zealot at the keyboard, and spit forth the 'stupid insular mac-user' comments, sound much more like the stereotypical mac-hater these days: hated OS8/9 at college, and don't know what a vastly different beast it is now. I wonder how many would be like that if they'd really used a modern Mac. (I mean *really* used, not just a few minutes at an Apple Store.)
type r 98 503 said 2:33AM on 1-24-2009
dill weed? you almost got me troll
Reply
Harrison said 2:45AM on 1-24-2009
Sorry, wasn't trying to "troll." Just open some eyes. Promise I won't post again for at least a year. (After this one of course.)
Apple makes good products, but I cannot understand why so many people think they are the ONLY ones worth buying.