Filed under: Google, iPhone, Browsers, Mobile, Android
WebKit optimized iGoogle gets canned

A year later, the optimized version of the site is gone. Instead, iPhone user and Android users get treated to the same crappy mobile iGoogle interface that other phones suffer through.
So much for progress.
On Saturday morning, when the change went into effect, users started asking questions in the iGoogle discussions page withing Google Help. The response from Google employee Paul:
Hey everyone, I have an update for you. We've decided to direct iPhone users to the standard mobile iGoogle page. We've found that people hit iGoogle from lots of different phones -- we want to ensure you'll all see the same version.
Most or all of your existing content should translate over to the standard mobile version. The only exception would be any gadgets that aren't compatible with most mobile browsers.
Needless to say, the masses who love their iGoogle were not assuaged. This brought up a whole list of accusations that Google is saving the special iGoogle interface for Android users only and punishing iPhone users for not buying the Google phone.
This isn't quite true.


L. iGoogle on the G1, R. iGoogle on the iPhone
iPhone users can rest a bit easier knowing that there is no widespread conspiracy; Android users get the crappy mobile interface too. They can just access Gmail from said interface.
Thanks for the tip Ben!
Get a WordPress.com Blog
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Morgan said 10:51AM on 1-19-2009
Depends on what you mean by progress.
I personally don't think that a hundred different platform-optimized versions of a page is progress, I think it sounds like 1996.
Then again, I have neither phone currently so maybe it is a tragedy.
Reply
Christina Warren said 10:54AM on 1-19-2009
That's a valid point, I guess my counter-argument would be, with the iPhone, Android and the Palm Pre all using WebKit as the basis for the mobile browser, and with Google making such a big deal about how "iPhone optimized" their stuff is, it seems odd for this feature to disappear. Better mobile browsers ARE the future. Keeping everything at WAP standards just doesn't make sense, though I think your point about supporting tons of different standards is right-on.
On a personal level, I don't care -- I don't use iGoogle enough for it to matter -- but the optimized site WAS a better user experience.
LordDaMan said 11:49AM on 1-19-2009
Why exactly would this be a surprise? Google has a history of pulling support for competitors.
Recall how they had support for IE7's Opensearch on teh google main page? That was until they filed a lawsuit against Microsoft over how hard it was to add search engines to ie7 and suddenly the opensearch provider on the google main page vanished
Reply
totoro said 12:10PM on 1-19-2009
This really sucks. So much for the unified desktop/mobile iGoogle experience. I'll stop using both now.
Reply
Ethan said 12:28PM on 1-19-2009
Also, it's entirely changed the content of the pages!
Reply
Jash Sayani said 12:34PM on 1-19-2009
Nice one Christina... Was waiting to read this one.
Reply
Barry Schwartz said 2:11PM on 1-19-2009
FYI, I think ben found it at http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/019234.html
Reply
Christina Warren said 2:13PM on 1-19-2009
I don't think so -- we got the tip Saturday afternoon but a migraine headache derailed my weekend and I couldn't get the post up until this morning.
Barry Schwartz said 2:27PM on 1-19-2009
Ah, then I apologize. feel free to remove the comments. I am sorry about that.
Reply
Christina Warren said 2:32PM on 1-19-2009
Oh, not a problem -- I understand wanting to check :-)