Filed under: Internet, Microsoft, Search
Microsoft kills off book, academic search products
Last year Google and Microsoft spent a lot of time trying to one up one another in the area of book search. Both companies launched products that would let users search within the text of thousands of books and display results in a web browser. Some of the books were public domain while others were copyrighted works scanned either with the consent of the copyright holders or in some cases without it. The whole thing was actually rather controversial. Except here's the thing - we're not sure either company bothered to find out if anybody was going to use the book search products.
About a year and a half after announcing the launch of its book search project, Microsoft is shutting down Live Search Books. The company is also shutting down the Live Search Academic project. Both web sites will be removed next week. Microsoft says books and academic results will be integrated into the regular search results but will no longer be indexed separately.
Microsoft digitized more than 750,000 books and 80 million journal articles over the past year or two. But the company has since had an epiphany - if you want to be in the search engine business you don't need to post content online, you just need to crawl it. So rather than continuing to scan books and articles that few people will read, Microsoft will wait for publishers to post their own content online and then scan it. We're betting Microsoft probably could have saved a lot of money if they had come to this decision a bit earlier.
Anyone want to guess how long it takes for Google to follow suit? Or is there actually a business model under which book scanning and search products actually make economic sense for Google?
[via Search Engine Land]
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Randy Mo. said 6:45AM on 5-24-2008
Who Knew ? There wasn't a real big advertiseing blitz about it that I can recall seeing. Were they going to charge per book or a lump charge for the service? I still think it is a good idea, There are books that I'd like to read online that are not on anybodys best sellers list like ," The Secret History of Procopius ."
Reply
RP said 6:47AM on 5-24-2008
The sad thing is -- I didn't even know that Microsoft had this feature. I knew about Google, since I read about it in the news.
If they spent $100 per book (x 750,000) + $1 per journal (x 80M), that's $155 million. They have, what, $50 billion in the bank? The big guys can afford to try things like this, on the chance they may take off.
Reply
Gardiner Westbound said 6:47AM on 5-24-2008
I would have used this, if I knew it was available.
Reply
Mysterius said 3:25AM on 5-26-2008
Google's philosophy means they're liable to continue the effort, anyways, even if it isn't a big money earner.
Reply