Filed under: Internet, Microsoft, Beta
Ask DLS: What do you think of Internet Explorer 8 beta 1?
But make no mistake, this is clearly beta software. IE8 beta 1 is not compatible with pre-release versions of Windows Vista SP1, doesn't work with a ton of IE7 add-ons like Skype, Google, and Yahoo! toolbars, and appears to enjoy making abstract paintings out of some web sites as you can see in the image above.
We know many Download Squad readers have been testing IE8 beta 1 out since the download links went live at about 3PM EST today, so what have your experiences been like? What works? What doesn't? What do you like? What needs improvement? And is Internet Explorer 8 likely to convince you to switch from Firefox, Opera, or whatever web browser you currently use?
Sound off in the comments.
Get a WordPress.com Blog
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Saurabh Agarwal said 4:53PM on 3-05-2008
installed it...tried to open.. kept throwing a Memory Exception error, despite restarts... couldn't be bothered to reinstall it and went back to IE7....i guess i'll be waiting until Beta 2? or RC 1...
Reply
RazorD said 4:51PM on 3-05-2008
Well, it completely breaks my dissertation project.. So i quickly uninstalled it and shall pretend its never been tested on it - That way i don't need to fix it! ;)
Reply
Jason said 4:55PM on 3-05-2008
so far no problems here and I must say it seems much more crisp and snappy (had a blt for lunch) then 7
Reply
Todd said 5:04PM on 3-05-2008
Long answer: It wouldn't install. Tried twice. Install screen hung on "checking for malicious software". Forced to Ctrl+Alt_Del and use Task Manager to kill off installer.
Short answer: EPIC FAIL!
Reply
CoffeeDaze said 5:06PM on 3-05-2008
It is obvious this is a beta release within seconds of using. Many pages are rendered with a Picasso touch. That being said, the new favorites bar, slightly better tab support, and WebSlices are nice touches. I can almost guarantee it won't have too many Firefox users switching back but any improvement in the IE experience is greatly welcomed.
Reply
Sirgen said 5:13PM on 3-05-2008
I don't like beta software, I'll wait for the official release.
Reply
Jack said 6:07PM on 3-05-2008
IE8 doesn't render anything correctly. I looked at the Acid2 test, and that renders wrong, Google Reader is totally screwed up. Heck, even Windows Live Mail doesn't render right. I know it's just a beta, but they should have fixed these kinks. Firefox did.
Reply
Derek Reiff said 6:11PM on 3-05-2008
Wow. Talk about beta software--though I've never had beta software behave this badly.
Firing it up the first time proved that the default ADDON page didn't render correctly. Went to google reader, poof. Bad render.
website after website rendered incorrectly..except google. Slow as **** and blah blah blah. beta beta beta.
That is all. I'll leave it installed and take the updates as they come though.. Firefox still has it.
Reply
Alex M said 6:15PM on 3-05-2008
I have 17 Firefox extensions, of which I consider at least 3 to be indispensable and another 3 very nice to have (the rest are simply nice to have). I am very glad IE8 is showing promise, but I'm not going anywhere.
Reply
Mysterius said 6:16PM on 3-05-2008
While rendering is hit-or-miss, the browser itself feels improved. It does seem faster than IE7, too, both in startup and in browsing. I agree with CoffeeDaze that this won't switch many alternative browser users over (unless they had Firefox nstalled for them, and buy a new computer with IE8 preinstalled), but I also agree that it's a welcome improvement. At the least, it should provide some motivation to Firefox and Opera to continue innovation.
@Download Squad: Why do you say the Google toolbar doesn't work? It seems to work on my installation. I already had Google toolbar installed, of course, so I don't know if a new install would be different, but everything seemed to migrate fine.
Reply
freaktech said 6:17PM on 3-05-2008
Installed everything works fine except for iGoogle. Preview drop downs and minimize buttons do not work. Other then that works fine.
Reply
Brad Linder said 6:21PM on 3-05-2008
Mysterious: Actually, MS says Google Toolbar doesn't work. We just assumed they knew what they were talking about. Glad to know they were wrong for once.
Reply
cubswillwinit said 6:23PM on 3-05-2008
EPIC FAIL. The thing doesn't display web pages properly and is slow and worse than IE7. I'm still using firefox 3 beta 3, and I'm not leaving that for sure. Trusty opera also blows this outta the water. I'm very sad for MS. Even ashamed.
Reply
CUBSWILLWIN said 6:30PM on 3-05-2008
It's suckish, slow, doesn't display webpages properly like you said and WORSE than IE7. Don't like the fact about restarting your rig for installing it completely. I'm beta testing frefox 3 beta 3 and it slaughters this. Even my trusty Opera browser blows this out of the water.
Reply
Brian said 8:12PM on 3-05-2008
I find it interesting how some people are able to go to the acid tests and pass them, yet when I do it, I see it obviously does not pass. WTF Microsoft?
Reply
mkwiecie said 7:20PM on 3-05-2008
ACID2 = FAIL
That is all.
Reply
David Martin said 8:26PM on 3-05-2008
I haven't had a single problem after I manually restarted the computer, but maybe I am the lucky one, or maybe my install was faulty and the bad code was missing. The only thing I dislike is all the superficial links to hotmail, windows media ect...
Reply
Kevin McCarthy said 8:57PM on 3-05-2008
Had np installing. I already had silverlight and had ie7pro and see no improvement over ie7 if any thing seems to be like all microsoft new programs needs lots of ram
Reply
hn333 said 10:16PM on 3-05-2008
Installed it, no problem. It even passed the official Acid2 test page. Nice.
Reply
Chambalam said 7:58AM on 3-06-2008
Much prefer Firefox, i find it better for basic and serious users, but lately when trying to design webpages, i'm sure it's my own personal style of web coding, but it took 10 minutes to code a page to work in FF, and another 11 hours to find a successful one in IE.
After days of changing things to suit microsoft, im no longer on the IE bandwagon.
Reply