Filed under: Internet, Macintosh, Mozilla
Easily run Firefox 2 and Firefox 3 beta side-by-side in OS X
by Christina Warren Feb 22nd 2008 at 6:00PM
So, you want to try out Firefox 3 and get a feel for the new features, but you don't want to risk corrupting, deleting or otherwise messing up your stable Firefox 2 installation. Sure, you can hit the command line, create a new profile and then customize the shortcut to each version of Firefox so that it launches the correct profile (or manually choose what profile you want at the start of each Firefox session), but that can be a pain -- especially if you want to try out different plugin configurations in Firefox 3.
Enter MultiFireFox, the fantastic little launching application created by Dave Martorana. Just download the DMG (the source file is also available if anyone wants to try to port this to Windows) and not only will you get Firefox 3 beta 3, but a very tidy little launching application. Upon running MultiFireFox for the first time, you will be instructed to create a second profile if you do not already have one (and the profile manager will start up automatically, no going into the command line to get it started). From that point, you can choose what profile and what version of Firefox you want to launch. You can even run the two side-by-side to test performance.
Although this program is Mac only, you can replicate the same functionality (if not the finesse) by following these instructions.
I don't know if this is a labor of love or merely the brainchild of four very gifted games designers, but Level Up is a really weird mash-up of gaming elements that you have probably never seen in a Flash game before.
Let's start with the premise itself: Groundhog Day meets Memento. The game experience revolves around 'days': you explore the world and the clock slowly ticks towards the evening. You bounce around picking up gems and talking to the denizens of 'Level Upland'. Eventually you feel tired and head back to ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Josh said 6:08PM on 2-22-2008
Honestly... if Mac users are still using Fx2, there is a problem. The improvements (especially graphically) are imense. Bugs are few and far between. All you need is Nightly Tester Tools and you are all set.
Reply
Christina Warren said 6:11PM on 2-22-2008
For most users, this might be true - but that certainly isn't 100%. For instance, here at Weblogs, Inc., we cannot use Safari to write blog posts - we have to use Firefox. However, Firefox 3 beta 3 does not work properly with our web software, meaning we have to either use Camino or keep a copy of Firefox 2 around.
I agree that the improvements are great, but it is still in beta and not appropriate for all users to use full time.
Big John said 6:21PM on 2-22-2008
Except that not all extensions work with Firefox 3 beta (whatever). Foxmarks and Google Browser Sync are the big ones that come to mind. Multiple systems? Too bad, sucka, deal with it! Until this came around, anyhow.
Also, the new GUI isn't that great. The address bar has curved sides like a search box and the buttons are pillbox (Mail.app) style instead of rounded corner box (Safari) style. Firefox 2 with an appropriate theme installed is still my choice.
I still have Minefield (nightly trunk application name) installed to play around with, but a lot of users still very much need Firefox 2.
Big John said 6:24PM on 2-22-2008
Also, if you really want to be on the bleeding edge, try out the latest nightly builds from the team.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/
These may not compile or run, use at your own risk etc. and they reset your security choices in your standard Firefox install (such as "alert me when I leave an encrypted page" boxes). It does install as a separate .app (Minefield) so they can coexist without this switching program.
Reply
Andrew said 7:24PM on 2-22-2008
Why not just run them individually as portable apps on your computer, then they don't interfere with each other
Reply
rustman said 7:29PM on 2-22-2008
Andrew.
please say more. (your comment seems to make
sense here, but I don't know why - please elaborate.)
rustman said 7:38PM on 2-22-2008
addendum - this is with all due respect to Christina Warren's article, and to the comments prior to Andrew's. please don't misunderstand the intention.
(however, this comments tool really does leave much to be desired.) (such as potential for posting, prior to author's review, and potential for alienating those who wrote original article (Christina Warren) or those who commented. )
Reply
Christina Warren said 7:57PM on 2-22-2008
You might want to check this out: http://portableapps.com/news/2008-02-13_-_firefox_portable_3_beta_3
They also have a version for Firefox 2.0.12. This is designed to be run off of a USB drive, but you can run it straight from Windows. It's self-contained, so it won't conflict with your other settings.
Reply
Andrew said 8:19PM on 2-22-2008
Sorry for the short comment, I hadn't read the whole article and just wanted to point out that there were easier ways of achieving the same outcome. I will further explain what Christina has just mentioned.
Portable Applications are designed to run from a removable drive and do not change any of the computer settings and usually just unzip and run from the folder.
So whilst I wanted to test the latest versions of Firefox Betas but keeping my own Firefox 2 running and unaffected as my main stable browser, so I just downloaded the convenient Firefox 3 Betas from Portable Apps and used it straight from its folder on my computer.
Firefox 3 Beta 3 portable
- http://portableapps.com/news/2008-02-13_-_firefox_portable_3_beta_3
Allowing me to keep my main browser and then just delete and re-download the new Betas as portables to play with with out having any conflicts.
Or you could just run both of them as portable apps
Firefox 2 portable
- http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable
Reply
Christina Warren said 8:30PM on 2-22-2008
Thanks Andrew!
For Windows users I think that doing it as a portable app is absolutely the best solution.
Andrew said 8:34PM on 2-22-2008
No worries glad to be of help,
keep up the good blog!
Reply
lakiolen said 8:54PM on 2-22-2008
Speaking of Firefox 3b3, has anyone else noticed that ctrl-e/ctrl-a no longer work? They worked in 3b2....
Reply