Filed under: OS Updates, Features, Linux, Open Source
Flipping the Linux switch: KDE, the K desktop environment
There's one thing for certain: Now is an exciting time to be a KDE user. The much anticipated launch of KDE 4 is slated for January 11th, 2008. This is a major revamp of the look and feel of the KDE desktop, with the inclusion of a built-in compositor (think eye candy) and something called "plasmoids" (little functional widgets embedded into your desktop).It's a lot of new bling aimed at improving the desktop experience. Will it? More importantly, will it for you? What would make you choose KDE over GNOME (or vice versa)? This week we take a brief look at KDE in both its 3.5.x and 4 incarnations, and outline a few rules of thumb on choosing your desktop environment.
Let's take a quick look at KDE's history and underpinnings. KDE was launched in 1996 and is based on the Qt (pronounced "cute") toolkit. (A toolkit is a set of libraries of the things that make up a graphical user interface -- things like windows, buttons and their functions.) But all was not right with the world. Qt, at that time, didn't use a completely free software license. This caused some concern about the legality of linking to Qt libraries, and the Debian distribution even went so far as to remove KDE from their repositories for a time.
Currently, Qt uses a dual license. The toolkit is available under the GPL (GNU General Public License) and the QPL (Q Public License), and linking to the Qt libraries is no longer an issue.

In KDE 4, the K Menu (among other things) got a radical makeover. The menu is divided into two parts, a lower panel consisting of several buttons: Favorites, Applications, My Computer, Recently Used and Leave (a really inelegant way of saying "shutdown menu"). The upper panel features animated menus depending on what is selected on the lower panel. Here you can see the Applications icon highlighted, with the Office applications loaded. It takes some getting used to (and is still a release candidate at the time of this post), but it is appealing to those who enjoy putting their own mark on the aesthetics and function of their desktop.
KDE is known for being highly customizable, both in terms of how the desktop looks and behaves, and how it ultimately handles the hardware on the system. The good news for you as a new Linux user is the amount of control you'll have over the desktop. You'll be able to configure things to look and act exactly as you want. The bad news? The amount of control you have can be puzzling to the point of frustration.
For example, setting up a printer in KDE opens a printer configuration window. Adding a new printer opens a wizard that walks you through the process. You'll find there are a lot of extra configuration options outside the wizard. It's safe to say many of them you won't need to worry about. It can be disconcerting to have that many options initially, but those who need their system fine-tuned will appreciate it.

Konqueror is the native KDE web browser. Firefox and other Mozilla based browsers, should you prefer them, work quite well in KDE. Dolphin was recently rolled out to replace Konqueror as KDE's file manager. With split-view folder browsing (and dragging and dropping across panes), you won't miss Windows Explorer at all.
KDE has a personal information manager suite, Kontact, consisting of KMail (an email client), a calendar, journal, note taker and the feed reader Akregator.
Digikam supports a variety of digital cameras, and is roughly equivalent to GNOME's gtkam. Through the use of kipi-plugins, you can easily use Digikam to archive photos to CD or DVD or upload to Flickr. Krita is the KDE photo-editing program. (We admit to using GIMP in place of Krita for most editing applications.)
KOffice is KDE's office suite, consisting of a word processor, spreadsheet, presentation and database application. There is also a Visio equivalent, and a vector graphic drawing application. OpenOffice, should you prefer it, integrates nicely with KDE. The desktop has two text editors, KWrite and Kate. We prefer Kate for most text editing tasks.
Multimedia files are handled with Kaffeine (video) and Amarok (audio). KDE also features the handy K3b burning application, which burns audio, video and data disks, as well as disk images.
Our advice to new Linux users who have little interest in looking "under the hood" of their computers, or who use their computer for straight web browsing, word processing and photo editing would be to try GNOME first. Former Windows (and Mac) "power users" will most likely want to start with KDE. We'd also encourage those who have computing requirements that are a little out of the ordinary to try KDE first, due to the level of customization it allows through the GUI. Before you make your decision, think about the programs that are associated with each desktop environment, and what you'd want to add on after the fact. If you find one toolkit's programs fit your work habits better than the other's, install the desktop with the most appealing applications.
GNOME or KDE? It might be GNOME this year, KDE the next, and Xfce after that. The beauty of Linux is that you're not tied to one desktop environment, or even to one distribution. You're free to have the system that works best for you.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Rumble said 12:52AM on 12-31-2007
Once again, nice rundown. KDE isn't for me, but run it if it's comfortable. At least it's better than Windows.
Reply
peter gusztav said 4:19AM on 12-31-2007
Linux is growing like 32% year on year compared to Microsoft. hope it stays that way, i also posted this on my blog, with a few extra comments., www.opentopix.com/topic/tech-news/linux-and-the-kde
Reply
Joe said 2:08PM on 12-31-2007
>> Linux is growing like 32% year on year compared to Microsoft.
Considering Linux has like a 0% market share, 32% growth is meaningless.
BobCFC said 6:05PM on 12-31-2007
grrr this is to Joe, why can't we reply to replies?
"Considering Linux has like a 0% market share"
Which market?
We OWN the supercomputing space, 7 out of the top 10 supercomputers run Linux. (other 3 run unix). I don't think windows is in the top 50.
We OWN the embedded space, things like Netgear adsl routers/gateways, TIVO, SatNav, Mobile Phones.
We OWN the internet server space, GOOGLE, AMAZON, PAYPAL etc all run on Linux. You use Linux everyday unless you live in a cave.
We OWN the third world. So what if 800million plus run windows, the planet is 6billion+ and growing. You think China is going to be beholden to MS? You think Brazil is going to grow it's fledgling industry (which barely has dialup) on vista? You think Africa can even afford to buy software?
We OWN the new sub $400 notebook space. ASUS eeePC? Prices will only come down further too. When the OS and Office become more than cost of the hardware things change.
We OWN the science space. You think NASA runs on windows?
We OWN the secret space. You think NSA runs on windows?
We OWN the distributed space. PIXAR makes all their films on Linux. You think SHREK was made on windows render farms?
We OWN the geek/early adopter space. Compiz Fusion baby.
Businesses and average Joes are late adopters and are stuck in the world of malware and viruses and DRM and forced upgrade policies and restriction.
But those business who have embraced open-source do not shout it from the roof tops because they would give up their competitive advantage. Why would they find an edge and then broadcast it to their rivals?
The whole industry is soo young it's unbeliveable. Look ahead 50-100 years. We will OWN the desktop too. If it even exists.
FIREFOX HAS 25% MARKET SHARE IN EUROPE
Gubatron said 6:18PM on 12-31-2007
I'm a Linux/Mac user, but this comment is so naive.
1% of Windows Growth is like 100000% of linux growth.
Marky said 4:28AM on 12-31-2007
Looking forward to version 4. There are still too many simalarities to Windows in the interface which leads to a lack of originality. Certainly we want the Windows people to jump ship but to slavishly copy some aspects of that OS is sad. A good interface should stand on it's own as intuative. That sad I prefer KDE to GNOME on my OpenSUSE install and like what I see for the future.
Reply
Brian said 11:03AM on 12-31-2007
* Intuition (knowledge) - understanding without apparent effort, quick and ready insight seemingly independent of previous experiences or empirical knowledge. (wikipedia)
"Intuitive" in today's world of computers is solely based on past experience, which a large majority is windows based OS.
I would like to see focus on "User Friendly" more than "intuitive". User Friendly to me means creating a system where similar interfaces are found in similar places throughout the OS. Making each section more "intuitive" based on your past experience in the operating system.
Also, the use of first time starting help messages/bubbles can be great help to new users, where other may just see them as nags.
jimbo said 10:51AM on 12-31-2007
I find it odd when so much focus is given to the applications that come along with the default install on a desktop environment. I pay absolutely no attention to this when considering what environment I'm going to use. If I want a Gnome app on my KDE desktop, I simply install the dependencies and go. I don't think new users need to concern themselves with this at all.
but that's just my .02
kisses,
jimbo
Reply
Cotorra said 11:32AM on 12-31-2007
I will digg this!!
http://www.spymac.com/details/?2320681
Reply
cyneuron said 8:30AM on 1-01-2008
In Response To Joe's Comments:
the way you describes Linux's dominance in various domains was awesome man....
Reply
dave said 4:17AM on 1-02-2008
AGREED!!!
Reply
BobCFC said 2:23PM on 2-14-2008
For the record, I think I got Dreamworks and Pixar mixed up in my earlier post.
Dreamworks made Shrek and it is Dreamworks who are famous for make all there films using Linux.
Reply
BobCFC said 2:35PM on 2-14-2008
s/make/making/g
s/there/their/g