I have an absolute weakness for physics games, and while Civiballs isn't the strongest physics-based game, what it lacks in the physics department it makes up for a few times over in style and fun.
In Civiballs, you are presented with a few colored balls, and your goal is to get those balls into the same-colored urn on the level. The "civi" part of Civiballs is that there are 3 sets of levels to play, each representing a different civilization. While the civilization doesn't affect gameplay, the artwork for each level is beautifully themed to it's appropriate era.
To play the game, you are given only one tool - a sword with which to cut the chains that are holding the balls. The puzzle part of the game is in figuring out what order, and with what timing to cut each chain. Do it right, and all the right balls end up in the right urns, with no stray balls entering an urn (a no-no). Do it wrong, and you get to start over again.
Civiballs is not terribly deep on gameplay; the entire game can be completed in about 15 minutes. But if you enjoy this type of game, it will be a very enjoyable 15 minutes.
View more Time Wasters
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Gardiner Westbound said 4:10PM on 10-22-2007
Microsoft undoubtedly raked in far more than the legal costs and $705 million penalty during the nine years it waltzed the EU court.
Reply
michael said 5:12PM on 10-22-2007
Oh yeah, a monopoly where people can also buy OS X, get Linux for free, and other choices.
That's definitely a monopoly that has controlled all our computer. I really hope those Microsoft fines help with your mini-tea parties there.
(sarcasm)
Reply
kdmurray said 8:07AM on 10-23-2007
I wanted to post a comment here about this... but the response ended up so long that I wrote a post about it. In short though, this smacks of government interference.
In a day and age where the percentage of Microsoft instances on home computers is as low as it's been in a decade, and falling with more Mac and Linux PCs sold each day, it doesn't make sense to stomp all over the intellectual property rights of companies.
I'm no Microsoft fanboy, hell I'm writing this on my macbook while setting up an Ubuntu Server, but I do believe an action like this is unfair to the company and will do little to benefit consumers in the long run.
Reply
Jano said 8:51AM on 10-23-2007
@Michael: tell that to the companies whose products depend on unreleased APIs from Microsoft. Fair play is not "I sell oranges you are free to sell something else or go bankrupt".
Reply
Jano said 8:52AM on 10-23-2007
Michael: tell that to the companies whose products depend on unreleased APIs from Microsoft. Fair play is not "I sell oranges you can sell something else or go bankrupt".
Reply
michael said 5:05PM on 10-23-2007
@Jano : Nobody told them they have to use Windows :)
They could have chosen Linux or OS X to do the job. But obviously, they, and the market, prefers Windows.
Reply
James said 5:27PM on 10-23-2007
[PS: Not to mention, who the hell says, "Your API isn't robust enough, I'm going to sue you!"?]
Reply
James said 5:28PM on 10-23-2007
Can anybody give me an actual - concrete! - example of one of these "unreleased APIs" for Windows? As a software developer who normally targets the Windows platform, I've never run into a situation where I said "boy, I wish I could do X, but MS just won't let me!". It's always been a matter of just looking hard enough for the function, which always turns out to have been right there in MSDN, waiting for me to find it. What are these people trying to do with Windows that they can't figure out on their own?
Reply