Filed under: News, Open Source
First US GPL lawsuit settled out of court
Just a few days after open-source developers took Monsoon Multimedia to court over alleged copyright violations, Monsoon has admitted guilt and has begun negotiating a settlement.What makes this interesting is that the copyright Monsoon Multimedia violated was technology protected by the General Public License or GPL. In other words, Monsoon had every right to use the open source technology. What they were not allowed to do was release a closed source product based on the open source technology.
Monsoon makes the Hava place-shifting box, which lets you stream audio and video content from your TV/cable box/DVD player etc to any internet connected PC. It works much the same way as a Slingbox.
The company used a modified version of the BusyBox software in its Hava software. As part of the settlement, Monsoon will make that code available on its website soon. This was the first copyright case that had gone to court involving the GPL license. Since the case is being settled out of court, the question of whether all the provisions in the GPL are enforceable will have to wait for another day.
Get a WordPress.com Blog
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Monoto said 11:51AM on 9-25-2007
"...the copyright Monsoon Multimedia violated was technology protected by the General Public License or GNL."
Isn't that GPL?
Reply
novakyu said 9:36AM on 10-07-2007
I find your word choices wrong and misleading. Busybox is not an "open source" software (unless you (somewhat wrongly) consider "open source" software as a superset of free software), it is a FREE SOFTWARE. If it were merely open source, it would have been licensed under BSD license (or something similar) and Monsoon would have been allowed to make a propriety derived work from it.
However, Busybox is licensed under GNU GPL, and that's what makes what Monsoon did wrong (legally and morally)---they are restricting your FREEDOM when they make a proprietary derived-work from Busybox, and GNU GPL is specifically designed to ensure that free software remains a free software (it has very little to do with "open source" and "closed source", although admittedly there are some unintended overlaps).
Reply