The folks over at Read/WriteWeb have put together a pretty compelling list of the 10 worst names for web 2.0 sites. All are real web services, and all are really bad names, for a variety of reasons.

Here's a snippet of R/WW's list.

• Fairtilizer is an online music community with a bafflingly unattractive name.
  
• Agester - how many sites must add a -ster to their name?
  
• Profilactic is a site that aggregates feeds, but we had to read the description a few dozen times before we could pay attention to anything but the site name
  
• iStalkr creates a stream of data from your RSS feeds including Digg, Flickr etc that you can share with others. But it's got a kind of frightening name, not to mention the me-too omission of the letter "e."

Sure, it's hard to come up with a good name that hasn't been used before. But is it really that hard? What are some of the poor excuses for a name you've run across in your Web 2.0 wanderings? And what new names would you give to the services above or other cool web sites with unfortunate names?