Perhaps one of the most obvious differences with, for example Twitter, is the Contact Groups feature. When posting any items to Pownce, you can specify whether to send it to All Contacts, Individuals, or the public timeline - posts are not automatically placed in the public timeline, and unlike Twitter you can specify whether posts are public (or not) on a post-by-post basis. You could, I guess, consider this to be encompassing Direct Messages, Public status updates and everything in between.

Message allows you to type 'til your heart's content. Seriously, you can! I typed a terribly long post into the Pownce client (more on that in a moment), expecting a sound to tell me I'd written too much: and it never arrived - compulsive writers be warned! The Link option does exactly what it claims to. It posts a link and a description. The thing I like about this option is that by specifying an update as a link, instead of just putting it in a 'Message', Pownce's website shows the given URL in a special area, not in-line with the rest of the update, which means that URLs your friends post don't get lost - a nice touch, and keeps the site somewhat less cluttered than Twitter.
Perhaps most interestingly are the last two options: File and Event. The File option allows you to upload any file up to 10MB in size to Pownce and share it with your contacts (again via groups, individuals or public). The uploads I did were fast and hassle free. Up next is the Event option, which is similar to services like Upcoming.org - post your event and people can RSVP accordingly (with more options than simply watching, attending or neither) - below you can see how Kevin Rose used it to announce the filming of a live episode of his Diggnation podcast in Palo Alto on Thursday.

Services such as Pownce and Twitter are great in the browser, but to achieve critical mass they need to get on the desktop and out of the browser. Pownce's only client for now is a cross-platform Adobe Integrated Runtime (AIR) application. If you're wondering what on earth AIR is, then you should check out Chris Brentano's look at AIR earlier this month. The application allows you to do everything that the website does - such as allow uploads - and works pretty well (especially for the 'alpha' tag it shows in the window). That said, I have to admit that I'm no fan of Flash (Flash is the underlying Adobe technology in AIR, with AIR itself simply adding a wrapper around the Flash .swf file to make it run on the desktop) so I'm not a huge fan of the Pownce app. However, a desktop application implies some kind of API (and there's mention of it on the Pownce site) so I'm hoping that just like Twitter has a plethora of third party addons (for every major platform, and now the iPhone too), Pownce can get some OS-specific third-party application love sooner rather than later.

The screenshot above gives you some idea of what to expect of the AIR application in-action, and also shows you what the adverts (or sponsored links) look like. Even at this early stage, Pownce has two account levels: Free and Pro. Free accounts get ads such as those above inserted on the website, and within the AIR client. There's also a limit on file uploads (10MB per file limit). The $20 a year Pro Account gets you 100MB per file uploads, an ad-free experience, and a 'Pro' badge inserted on your profile. Twenty bucks a year is fairly reasonable, and whilst I'd likely pay that, I doubt I would pay it until I've established a network similar to the one I have on Twitter right now.
Everything considered, I'm impressed with Pownce. It does seem to be a service that's trying to do perhaps just a little too much, and perhaps needs to think about its purpose period. That qualm aside, I use Twitter incessantly, and Pownce brings some neat features to the 'status service' arena. Sure, Pownce does a lot of thing, and some may see it as a service that offers just a little too much (I'm not entirely convinced with the 'rating' of posts yet - simply making a post a favourite as per Twitter is enough for me), but I really think that it has potential. The ads are inconspicuous, which is a welcome touch - and it's good to see there's a business model upfront. Twitter may be getting some venture capital in the future, but that is little consolation for those of us who've had to suffer the unreliability of the service to date. Unlike the Twitter.com website, I will happily use the Pownce.com website - it's far less cluttered and, at least for now, is far more stable than Twitter thanks to the small (but growing) list of invitees signing up. So far, I'm pretty impressed, however there are, of course, a few negatives that I just have to mention.
Firstly, there's no SMS updating, or IM updating or uploading yet. Although I occasionally turn on Twitter updates to forward to my mobile phone, the lack of received SMS updates is not something I really miss - my SMS inbox fills up too darn quickly! That said, I would like to be able to update my own status via SMS once in a while (or perhaps send a mobile-phone camera photo over as a file). Another thing is that the service seems to not be sure what its actual purpose is. To send things to friends cubicle to cubicle, I wouldn't upload to Pownce - I'd use a local server or Bonjour, and whilst storing files is neat, I'd prefer to upload my top photos to Flickr and link them, instead of uploading them to Pownce.
Here's the other downside - and it's something of a large one where I'm concerned. Whilst I love the neat touches, the slick website design, and the (generally) uncluttered web interface, my dilemma is this: I don't ever keep a browser permanently open (I'm forever using CPU cycles by quitting and then re-opening the browser whenever I need it) - I live in Twitterrific, and I swear by native OS X applications. The look, feel and integration with an OS make using native applications so much more rewarding to use, and by using AIR, Pownce just doesn't offer that yet. Once the Pownce team decide to open up the API for some 3rd Party developer love, and I can move away from the AIR-based client (whose behaviour is somewhat annoying), it'll have my assured thumbs up.
Pownce is currently in a closed alpha test, with a signup list for those wanting to get their hands on an invite. For those of you still waiting, then I've brought together a gallery of Pownce screenshots to show you what you're missing out on.
Summary
The Good: Generally Excellent Website User Interface (Particularly when compared with Twitter.com), Reliable Website, File Uploads, Contact Groups
The Bad: The 'everything and the kitchen sink' feature set that tries to encompass all the tools you might need, the huge amount of options that will confuse and annoy you at first, no SMS updating with messages. The fact that it seems to be confused with what its actual purpose is - part Tumblr, part Twitter, part Box.net.
The Ugly / Downright Annoying: That AIR application. 'Nuf said. It's not that the application is badly designed, per se, but more that I'd rather use a OS-specific client that behaves like any native desktop app would. Bring on a public API. Oh, and email notifications that simply point to the URL of each relevant update, and contain absolutely no content? Lame. Turn them off under Settings -> Notifications, otherwise your inbox might end up like our very own Lisa Hoover's before too long.














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-02-2007 @ 8:48AM
Graham said...
I may use it when there is a native OS X application (such as Twitterific) and when I have time to work out the API so I can update through Quicksilver, but not before. Twitter is just too slick on the mac side at the moment. It really needs SMS support too.
Reply
7-02-2007 @ 4:58PM
Mason said...
I'm disappointed that you would look down on the app just because it's based on Adobe's AIR. If anything, that's a benefit - it allows for easy cross-platform development while maintaining a consistent L&F across them both. It's like Java, only prettier, lighter-weight, and... not-Java.
As for being disappointed for no SMS-updating - you said it yourself (and they have, too): they created Pownce for communication purposes, for sending info from one "cube" to another. Yes, it's modeled after Twitter, but it's also limited to its own purpose, to make it "fit". If Kevin and his team merely created another Twitter, people would go, "Oh. It's just Twitter with files" and not sign up.
I work at a small programming shop. This kind of thing is perfect for sending short links, notes, and files between coworkers. Do I *need* to be able to SMS a message to by boss, who is down the hall?
I think it's a good thing to boil down your requirements to the base minimum you need to deliver. Use AIR to decrease development time and ensure a base for system-requirements and system-stability, and trim features down to what is best immediately. As The Company Who Shall Not Be Named says, "Build half a product, not a half-ass product" - I think they did this quite nicely.
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 1:04AM
Anton said...
Hi if anyone has an extra invite. Please send it to antond[at]creativerevolt[dot]com
Reply
7-03-2007 @ 3:40PM
Colin said...
My user icon is in the gallery ten times. Wow.
Reply
7-04-2007 @ 11:03AM
Nik Fletcher said...
Mason,
IMHO If people were to want a consistent L&F, there would be no innovation in UI and there would be no difference between OSes. The Pownce client does very few Mac OS X things, with regards to behaviour (the close button is on the wrong side, there's no preferences, keyboard navigation or or observation of the OS X menu bar).
You mention that Pownce isn't designed to compete with Twitter, hence no SMS. However if you were in an office situation, would you need to use an external service in lieu of an in-house local server (for files), Bonjour for IM (why message on Pownce when IM statuses and messages work just as well?) and a blog for public posting and commenting? IT departments would, surely, prefer to keep things in house or at least on an FTP setup of their own instead of letting things hit Pownce?
Reply
7-05-2007 @ 7:21PM
Jon BlogThot.com said...
Isn't Pownce essentially a Basecamp for personal use? If Basecamp had a second messaging option for events and allowed public posting, I'm not sure there'd be very much difference at all.
The core idea of Pownce is "share files with your friends", yet I can share files through Basecamp just fine. Am I thinking about this the wrong way?
Reply
7-06-2007 @ 4:05PM
Jon BlogThot.com said...
Isn't Pownce essentially a Basecamp for personal use? If Basecamp had a second messaging option for events and allowed public posting, I'm not sure there'd be very much difference at all.
The core idea of Pownce is "share files with your friends", yet I can share files through Basecamp just fine. Am I thinking about this the wrong way?
Reply
8-28-2007 @ 5:17PM
fernanda palacios said...
como puedo hacer para cerrar una cuenta de pownce que ya no se va a usar?
Reply