Filed under: Windows, Macintosh, Linux, Open Source
Run Linux apps on Windows or OS X with Lina
The idea is that developers will be able to create programs for one platform, and they'll be able to run on three different operating systems. This could both expand the market for open source Linux applications, and cut down work for developers. Lina will be free for open source developers, while a licensing fee will apply to commercial developers.
Lina is still a work in progress, with no support for GTK+ or USB peripherals yet. The virtual machine takes up less than 40MB when installed.
[via Slashdot and Linux Devices]
Get a WordPress.com Blog
With Halloween fast approaching, it's a great time to get in some practice defending your territory against zombies. In Graveyard Shift, you take aim at zombies and other creepy-crawlies, blasting them into splatters of cartoony green guts. It's a casual first-person shooter, and it's very easy to get the hang of - use the mouse to aim, click to fire. Graveyard Shift has at least 15 levels, and it might even have some secret stages I haven't unlocked yet.
They key to getting good at Graveyard Shift is learning to use ...

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
aleenm88 said 10:57PM on 5-27-2007
who would want that? should't be backwared? run windows or mac apps on Linux
Reply
Me said 10:58PM on 5-27-2007
Hurrah! Finally, Amarok on Windows!
Reply
Kevin said 10:58PM on 5-27-2007
I don't see the point. GTK has already been ported to Windows and is in the process of being ported to OS X. Qt apps already run pretty much everywhere (Skype being an example). All it takes for both in many cases is a recompile. This is more than a little redundant, especially since these programs can be run natively.
Reply
noak said 8:10AM on 5-28-2007
I actually read about it first here:
http://ostoolbox.blogspot.com/2007/05/lina-linux-applications-on-windows-and.html
Seems like this solution depends on implementing system call support for each GUI toolkit supported.
Reply
poopadoop said 10:30PM on 5-28-2007
Retarded... Just use linux on OSX and avoid windows! :)
Reply
Steve said 10:30PM on 5-28-2007
I dont get it....these people talk too fast and their video sucks
Reply
Matt said 10:30PM on 5-28-2007
JAVA Anyone?
Reply
dude said 10:30PM on 5-28-2007
Yeah, I liked this concept better, back when it was called JAVA.
Reply
Markus Sorensson said 10:30PM on 5-28-2007
Is that a guy and a girl or two lesbians?
Reply
Matt said 7:34AM on 5-29-2007
@7 - Java in the Status Quo too slow on most compies =[
Reply
jak said 7:34AM on 5-29-2007
I can see using this to test drive certain apps before doing a switch to Linux. There are two Windows apps I use daily and if I knew that linux equivalents existed and worked the way I want I would make the switch myself.
Reply
Ari said 7:34AM on 5-29-2007
Why did they use nano as an example when it already comes with OS X as a native console binary?
Reply
Anon said 7:34AM on 5-29-2007
I totally thought the person on the left was a decent looking girl, and the guy on the right was ugly.
Reply
devon said 7:35AM on 5-29-2007
java solves this problem, but from the sounds of it the luna project extends cross platform to many other languages which is a plus
Reply
Smoke Tetsu said 7:36AM on 5-29-2007
I for one would want to use this if you could get The GIMP running through it as that is really the only "Linux" app and I put that in quotations because The GIMP isn't strictly a Linux app. But I would like this if it meant The GIMP becomes more integrated than using it through X11 which it looks like it would be.
Also I think there is enough room for projects like thisbecause first of all it doesn't seem like the native GTK for OS X would integrated the menu bar and such the same way as this does and even on windows this might seem more native than the GTK port there. On there even though there is a theme that takes your system skin and apply it to the application it still looks and feels very much like a foreign application.
I just wonder how much of an overhead there would be with this particularly on the PowerPC.. or if it requires Intel (on the Mac) or what.
Reply
MagikMan74 said 9:52AM on 5-29-2007
guy/girl debate aside, and the validity or useability of this aside.... did anyone else run out of breathe reading #15?
Reply
alex said 1:09PM on 5-29-2007
this is great... i would like to use linux but am stuck on WinXP right now. There are some apps which only are developed for *nix that i would like to have available to me.
Reply
Eric said 1:13PM on 5-29-2007
Okay, so what? Most of us want our Windows Apps on Linux, not the other way around.
Call me when you can run Windows Apps seamlessly in Linux. Until then, I'll continue using Windows XP and Vista.
Reply
dev said 5:00PM on 5-29-2007
Why???
Most of linux applications have a windows, osx ports.
Hellooo, hello anybody there... "Open Source"...
Reply
dev said 5:00PM on 5-29-2007
Why???
Most of linux applications have a windows, osx ports.
Hellooo, hello anybody there... "Open Source"...
Reply