Filed under: Fun, Games, Internet, Windows, Time-Wasters
by Ryan Sullivan Feb 28th 2007 at 11:00AM
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Advertise with Download Squad. (Learn more)
| # | Blogger | Posts | Cmts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jay Hathaway | 103 | 5 |
| 2 | Lee Mathews | 76 | 20 |
| 3 | Sebastian Anthony | 67 | 227 |
| 4 | Brad Linder | 35 | 2 |
| 5 | Jason Clarke | 27 | 0 |
| 6 | Paul O'Brien | 8 | 0 |
| 7 | Grant Robertson | 6 | 3 |
| 8 | Dolores Parker | 6 | 2 |
| 9 | Victor Agreda, Jr. | 6 | 1 |
| 10 | Nik Fletcher | 5 | 0 |
| 11 | Matt Heerema | 3 | 0 |
| 12 | John Burke | 2 | 0 |
| 13 | Download Squad Staff | 1 | 0 |
portable google halloween twitter webkit facebook virus firefox features Windows7 false android flash windows-7 sync music GoogleDocs time-waster userscripts game apps mobile iphone games microsoft TimeWaster gmail add-ons linux privacy GoogleChrome photoshop search mac advertising video bing google-chrome opera malware Tumblr chromium download Beta SocialNetworking AppStore browser rss youtube security
All contents copyright © 2003-2009, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
Download Squad is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Diddle said 12:38PM on 2-28-2007
Totally wikkid time waster. Thanks guys!
94430 on my first try!
Reply
Jared said 3:45PM on 2-28-2007
first try:
105440
level 25
10-card combo
Reply
Ryan said 2:08AM on 3-01-2007
First try. Started panicking towards the end...
Score: 135320
Level: 31
Max Combo: 15
Card Count: 266
Reply