Filed under: OS Updates, Windows, Microsoft, Commercial
Vista Countdown: 4 Days - Your Moment of Zen
by Jordan Running Jan 26th 2007 at 7:00PM
Today seemed like it was gonna be a low-buzz day for Vista's impending retail release, until I came across this tidbit: Microsoft chairman Bill Gates is scheduled to appear on The Daily Show With Jon Stewart on Monday, just an hour before Vista's midnight launch. As Candace Lombardi over at CNet points out, John Hodgman, who plays the PC on Apple's "I'm a Mac" ads, is a regular Daily Show contributor. I really hope Stewart & Co. can get the two together for some hijinks. We'll be sure to post some video as soon as we can get our little paws on it.In other news, remember that huffing and puffing over Vista's copious DRM cruft and the response on Microsoft's Vista blog? Well, of course there's now a response-to-the-response. Peter Gutmann, who wrote the original "Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection" to which the Vista blog post was in reply, has added an addendum to the original article in, er, reply. Gutmann calls Microsoft's response "PR spin" and makes a pretty strong case, but I'll leave it to you to judge for yourselves.
Lastly, a Vista tips from the fine folks over at Lifehacker: How to disable annoying "Need your permission to continue" prompts. To quote our own David Chartier: "What happens when you try to save your users from your own security and usability mistakes over the last 15 years or so? Apparently, they revolt and hurl your solutions right back in your face."
In case you're not all caught up, you can check out the previous three days of our Vista Countdown over here.
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Matt S. said 12:19AM on 1-27-2007
I dont understand anyone who claims that already "hate" UAC in Vista. People complain that theres not enough security in XP so what does MS do they do something about it and develop new security features. Now everyone complains and "TURNS OFF" this new security feature. Doesnt make sense to me.
Reply
Dave Chartier said 12:24AM on 1-27-2007
People have a very difficult time giving up security and luxury, apparently even at the expense of their time, sanity, personal finances and precious files. I was honestly floored when I saw that Lifehacker hint about shutting off the access/security warning.
Reply
Ravensworth said 2:33AM on 1-27-2007
There's nothing wrong with security, but UAC is not security. It's just annoying. Try to rename or move a file, even if it's just a picture of a horse your kid drew in paint. WARNING! WARNING! Click OK to continue. You get those stupid popups constantly, every little thing you do. It's insane and makes the OS almost unusable. People are either going to disable it or just click OK out of habit. UAC is very poorly implemented, it's just idiotic.
Reply
GrizzlyAdams said 1:35AM on 1-27-2007
Whats with this 4 days wait? My copy of vista just arrived in the post today. Now to find $139 to upgrade to Ultimate... then another $100 to get Vista Home for my parents (2 PCs)
Reply
Kevin Seitz said 4:08AM on 1-27-2007
Has anyone bothered to look in Local Security Policy? There are settings for UAC, including having administrator accounts automatically upgrade permissions for an operation (meaning no UAC prompt). With this setting, UAC is "off" for administrators but on for standard users. After you do all your software installs, only log in as the standard user unless you have to use the administrator account. This leaves the option available for performing any operation as the standard user (with given credentials) instead of denying the operation and requiring the administrator to log into his/her account. I'd say this is the safest but least annoying alternative to turning UAC completely off. Additionally, I believe the built-in administrator account is not prompted by UAC... but there is a setting in Local Security Policy for that too.
Reply
Matt S. said 1:13PM on 1-27-2007
Ravensworth: I believe you are basing what UAC does in the RCs of Vista as what it will do in the final release. As one of the lucky few to recieved a free copy Vista Ultimate for being a beta tester. I have been using it for 2 months now and UAC isnt THAT annoying anymore. And to tell you the truth I think its worth the extra step because say something malious does find its way onto your computer you will have to allow it in UAC for it to install. As I have witnessed twice. Thats if it gets saved in the first place. But you dont allow it, it doesnt get installed and you are protected by an unauthorized access to your computer. Stop complaining Vista is 10x better than XP ever was.
Reply
Ravensworth said 2:35AM on 1-29-2007
That's your opinion, I'll take XP over Vista any day. Besides if you run XP properly (ie not running as an administrator all the time) it's just as secure. My being able to move or rename one of my own files without being assaulted by popups has nothing to do with malware.
Reply