Admittedly, JacksonPollock.org is a bit disconcerting at first. The site loads as a blank window, so you're confused to begin with. (Although you won't be, dear readers, since I've given you the heads up.) When you move your cursor anywhere within the browser window, a streak of "paint" is splashed across your virtual canvas. Each time you click, the paint changes color. And you don't have the luxury of picking up your "brush" and deciding where to place it next; oh no, that wouldn't be abstract enough.
Potentially, this can provide hours of amusement and artistic exploration. Just look at the masterpiece I created:
(Thanks, Niki!)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-06-2006 @ 4:49PM
matt said...
We posted about this over on Drawn.ca a little while back - stirred up a bit of controversy in the comments section:
http://drawn.ca/2006/06/12/being-jackson-pollock/#comments
Apparently the basic code was ripped off of Eric Stamen?
Reply
10-10-2006 @ 8:05AM
Cory Anotado said...
From those comments from Drawn!
# Cassidy Curtis Says:
June 13th, 2006 at 9:56 am
I feel the need to clarify the history here a little bit on behalf of the team at Stamen, who are good friends of mine.
The original SWF that Stamen put up was just a little toy they created for fun. They didn’t go around claiming it was “art” or any such nonsense. These are not pretentious people. Go check out their site, you’ll see what I mean. Very down to earth, hard-working people.
So then this Manetas guy took Stamen’s little SWF– the entire thing, intact, since a SWF file does not contain source code and cannot be modified– and put it on his own website, claiming he himself had created it. He then asked Eric for the source code, so he could modify it– apparently because he didn’t even know enough about Flash to reverse-engineer it, which is incredibly stupid when you think about it, because it is quite frankly a very simple toy! (A great idea, but very simple if you spend a few moments analyzing how it works.)
And now, years later, Manetas has stolen yet another artist’s name, and is still passing off Stamen’s work as his own, now calling it “Jackson Pollock by Miltos Manetas”. Give me a break.
Anyone who’s too techno-illiterate to reverse-engineer a simple Flash toy has no business calling himself a “digital artist”, or whatever silly name this guy has invented to market himself. Time to move on.
Reply