Filed under: Design, Fun, Internet, Text
Don't click it
Here is an interesting site that is very different in terms of its user interface. The weird thing is that the site itself does not want you to click on it (after the first time). The entire interface is created in flash and simply lets the mouse-over do all the walking. While I don't think it will catch on in a big way, in is clever, well-done, and like a prototype car, is a good proof of concept. It is hard to not click the site, since everything we do online is based on clicks, but it is possible. I almost don't mind the dontclick.it interface, but it must be an incredibly time-consuming way to build a web interface, and it makes you feel as though you don't have quite so much control over what happens on the page, which is a bit disconcerting. I would tell you to go check it out, but then you would have to click on the link, so that defeats the whole purpose. Oh well.
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
everythingyellow said 2:05PM on 10-04-2006
It would be so hard to resist clicking, but it is something new and different so I could see why people would be interested in it.
Reply
Matt Petty said 1:06PM on 10-04-2006
I clicked, to see how it works. The window opened up, it told me to 'prepare my mind' and then click one last time to enter the no-click zone. And then I couldn't do anything. Why? Because Flash (AFAIK) can't resize the content to fit the small window I was using. The navigation buttons along the top were off the page, and the warning about minimum screen size requirements was off the left of the screen. This is why I hate 100% Flash-based interfaces, clicky or not.
I, or Flash, could have resized my browser window, but I thought we'd left that kind of prescriptive interface behaviour behind in 1999.
"Please resize your browser to 800x600 to view this page..."
Reply
Alex M said 1:28PM on 10-04-2006
Meh. They go overboard. It's kind of nice for navigation, if the targets are big enough and the timing is just right (the usual caveats re Flash apply, of course).
But I think other types of actions definitely need the clicks. Dammit, if I'm going to submit an e-mail (or a comment) I want to click a flippin' button.
Reply
Sean said 2:03PM on 10-04-2006
bah lame.
I use a trackball, and I can't do the fancy "gestures" they suggest for activating buttons.
Also, because mousing over the target actually moves the target, I was getting lost because of unintentional actions.
Reply
Joe said 1:38PM on 10-05-2006
This is great, I love it. I browsed throught all the content of that website without a single click. And I do feel better without clicking.
This is the way to go, and will change the world!
Reply
advation said 7:07PM on 10-05-2006
It's an interesting concept, however I found it harder to navigate because of the sites layout and how the site interacted with the actions of the mouse. I feel "clickable" websites still hold the higher ground.
Reply
Hobofuzz said 12:12AM on 10-09-2006
Clicking will never go away.
Clicking on objects and stuff allows us to decide when we want something to open. Having a link just open because we moved our mouse over it is plain silly and impractical.
This is like your car revving up just because your foot hovered over the accelerator. You wouldn't want that, now would you?
I don't like it >.
Reply
Mustang 2012 said 4:57PM on 10-10-2006
Sorry but this site is horrible. Clicking is natural, and this type of browsing isnt. God forbid you move you mouse a little to one side or the other because you'll wind up on a totally different page.
Reply