Filed under: Fun, OS Updates, Linux
Readers Sound Off: The best Linux distro ever
by Ryan Carter Sep 18th 2006 at 11:45AM
Readers, in your opinion, what is the very best Linux distro and why? I have heard everything from Ubuntu (though it isn't clear how you pronounce it) to Gentoo, Knoppix, Debian, Xandros, Linspire, and so on...You can see the dilemma. For anyone who isn't familiar with Linux, or someone just starting out with Linux, which distro is the best? The easiest to install? Easiest to use? Which comes with the most or best applications pre-bundled? Best for XP users who want to play with Linux? Best Live CD Linux? On this post, you get the last say. Depending on the response to this, I will post the results of this "poll" in a day or two with your top choices for Linux distro. So feel free, sound off, it's up to you! I'll be handing out stars to the top (most informative or creative) comments.
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Bill said 12:16PM on 9-18-2006
It depends on what your needs are. If you want to install Linux on an older PC for surfing & email, I'd check out Slax.
If you want something with a huge userbase that's bound to be able to offer you tech support, Ubuntu may be the ticket.
If you're looking for the easiest distribution for Windows users, Xandros is probably your best bet.
If you want something to install on a server within an organization, Redhat may be your best bet.
If you want to be impressed with the visual goodness Linux can offer, take a look at http://www.sabayonlinux.org for some XGL/Compiz goodness.
BTW, I originally used links for each of the names, but the wonderful comment system only allows 3 hyperlinks for some stupid reason.
Reply
Sergio said 12:56PM on 9-18-2006
I know this is not a very good reason, but I use Fedora Core at home because it's related to Red Hat, which is everywhere. I'm by no means a Linux power user yet, I'm stillmaking my way to that status, but I hope learnind FC helps me in the event of having to deal with a linux server at work.
I also like KDE better than Gnome (another lame reason), and Ubuntu (my other option) is primarily built on Gnome (I know about kubuntu, but the support is not same thing as the main distro.)
Support for Fedora Core is pretty good and fast. The community is not as large or sizzling as Ubuntu but it's still very large and active.
Reply
Shaun Dewberry said 12:51PM on 9-18-2006
Take it from a South African - Ubuntu is pronounced, well, "Ooo-Boon-Two".
Reply
joshua m. neff said 1:32PM on 9-18-2006
Oh, good, I've been pronouncing it right.
I've used Mandrake, Red Hat & Fedora, and Ubuntu, and Ubuntu has been the best by far. It installed on my laptop without difficulty. Upgrading to Dapper Drake (the latest stable release) messed it up, but the Ubuntu online community was very patient and helpful, and I soon got everything sorted out. I really love Ubuntu.
Reply
Lisa said 1:25PM on 9-18-2006
oo-BOON-too - http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=ubuntu&gwp=13
Reply
william kane said 10:01PM on 9-19-2006
I have tried several linux distros and have found ubuntu the easiest to use when coming over from windows xp.that being said it is still difficult to work with especially downloading software that is not included.I really dont see any advantage to linux other than that it is free.
Reply
Marc said 1:44PM on 9-18-2006
I've been pretty impressed with Ubuntu, though I'd have to agree with Bill that there's room for more than one distro, depending on your needs. Slax is great if you want to run Linux from a thumbdrive, and it really does run smoothly on older machines, something that can't be said for all distros.
Reply
eleongonzales said 2:00PM on 9-18-2006
I've used mandrake, SUSE, Ubuntu, Mepis, Fedora, Red Hat, and a variety of live distros- Knoppix, mepis, DSL, etc...
Ubuntu was by far the best for support and recognizing hardware, but Overall I prefered the ease of use of Mepis. Granted there was a little hand holding, but I'm no where near a power user and I found setting up grub with mepis to be easier than with any other distro. Mepis even supports my completely outdated 500mhz dell optiplex, while anything above "badger" (i think it is code named) ubuntu fails during the install.
Knoppix, hands down, best live cd or dvd.
Reply
Anthony said 2:27PM on 9-18-2006
add another vote for ubuntu. it just works. but i agree, there is definitely room for more than one distro depending on your needs.
Reply
Robb Topolski said 3:24PM on 9-18-2006
Of the 7-8 distros that I've tried:
Best distro for someone who just wants to use a computer every day, and not mess around with a command line very much:
Ubuntu
Best distro for someone who wants to balance usability and customization, and perhaps run a server:
Fedora Core and Ubuntu -- pretty much a tie
Best distro for emergency repair/recovery of Windows or Linux PCs or data:
Knoppix
Reply
housetier said 3:50PM on 9-18-2006
started with suse 5.0 (worked, but updating did not)
then came debian potato which was a revelation
dissatisfied with the way the debian community treated beginners I began to look or other distros and found my happiness in ubuntu.
ubuntu is what I use, it is what I love. It certainly is what I recommend.
Most important: it works.
Their community is extraordinarily friendly unless I am in the channel ;)
Reply
Tia said 4:32PM on 9-18-2006
The question I'd like to have answered is specifically which distro has the best READ EASIEST hardware driver support. I'd like a distro that will recognize creative soundcards without having to mess all of that weird kernel rebuilding stuff. As a beginner, it is aggravating to have an OS that won't support sound without all kinds of strange voodoo stuff.
Reply
Roy said 4:32PM on 9-18-2006
I started with Slackware (14 years ago!), but just played around with it. Got serious in 1998 and installed Red Hat. When RH went strictly commercial, I moved to Gentoo (which is not exactly friendly, but optimizes great). Earlier this year, after several years of Gentoo accretion, an attempt to upgrade gcc went horribly wrong. Since I'd just installed Kubuntu on my laptop with *no* problems, I installed it on my AMD/nVidia desktop and I doubt I'll be going back.
The Ubuntu line has the "It Just Works" thing down cold. I'm up to 3 Ubuntu boxen at home (Intel laptop, AMD desktop and a repurposed G3 iMac), and two server installs at work (both Intel).
As for rescue/LiveCD, Knoppix has a slight lead over Ubuntu, but I find myself reaching for Auditor or SysRescue almost as often. (and I do need to build a chntpwd CD that will recognize SATA drives Real Soon Now)
Reply
etat said 5:30PM on 9-18-2006
Um. Knoppix for ease of seeing something work. I tried red hat and Mandrake before getting that bit right.
Then I went for Kubuntu. It worked too. But I don't have time to go to the forums every other day and ask involved questions about this or that. So when my kubuntu installation started to do things I hadn't asked for, I went back to Windows full time. One day a real linux will come along, and I will poke arouind under the dashboard to mess with things just like I do now. But I haven't seen it yet.
Reply
ben said 8:07PM on 9-18-2006
a couple of weeks ago i received from my dad one of his older computers(win 98 5 years old was good back then) and since i already had a laptop with xp i decided to try ubuntu and as a first time linux user it was great. it is easy to install and not that much different of an interface than windows plus it has some nice features that would be nice for windows(4 different desktop veiws). also the computer was not running so well on windows but now it work much faster.
i feel that if like me you are a first time user of linux ubuntu is the way to go.
Reply
Scott-O-Rama said 9:28PM on 9-18-2006
While I've played with several Linux distro's including Knoppix, Xandros, Linspire, Novell/Suse, Mandrake, etc, the only one I've ever found easy to use AND worth using was Ubuntu.
Reply
Virion said 9:43PM on 9-18-2006
I've always prefered Mandrake (though in the past I used RH or Slackware), it's the only one that both detected all of my old laptop's hardware AND by default had the right trackpad responsiveness (Ubuntu always seemed too responsive, even if I turned it down completely I'd go zooming across the screen.)
For LiveCDs I prefer Slax, it's nice and small for old systems, and has loaded great on several old boxes I've cobbled together or stumbled upon.
Reply
Kevin M. said 2:08AM on 9-19-2006
From experience, it's Ubuntu all the way for me.
I started out with Fedora core, but I just couldn't get wireless working, and there was too much to mess around with. Installing flash was a pain!
Then along came the ubuntu family... What a relief! I started with Kubuntu, but I don't reccomend that for beginners. Plain old Ubuntu has much better support, and GNOME programs are just more common. KDE likes to use its own programs (all with a nae starting with K) where as GNOME uses very popular programs, like Gaim, Firefox, evolution, and a stellar collection of games (comes pre-installed with Ubuntu!).
But as you get into Linux, you may find KDE more to your tastes. It acts a lot like Mac. I have a small partiton for Kubuntu when I want it, but I still prefer Ubuntu.
But beyond the environments, the Ubuntu family of distros is some amazing technology. Hands down, Synaptic (Kynapti in Kubuntu) is the best way to download/install programs. Also, the Wiki on Ubuntu.com has loads of information that is written just for Ubuntu. Many problems are solved there! It makes the Windows/Mac transition a breeze.
Also, Ubuntu has an excellent Live CD, but it's not quite meant for use beyond testing the waters and installing. If you're unsure, just head to Ubuntu.com, get some free Live CDs shipped to you (I suggest the 3-pack, 1 x86, 1 PowerPC, 1 64-bit), toss it in your CD drive, reboot, and enjoy! However, it's slower than an OS optimized for such an application, but it is full-featured.
If you need a fast/low demand distro thats still powerful, go with Xubuntu.
Overall, most mainstream Linux distros will save you (and your computer) from suffering, but Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Edubuntu, and Xubuntu are the logical choice for any purpose.
Reply
Huw said 9:25AM on 9-19-2006
I'd have to say Ubuntu too, if we're talking about Linux newcomers. I started using Linux at the start of this year and tried loads of distros. I avoided Ubuntu like the plague for the simple (and cynical) reason that everyone else in the world seemed to be using it, but I gave it a go in the end and have stuck with it ever since.
Mepis has great hardware detection but comes with KDE by default which, to be honest, I don't recommend for beginners. Fedora Core is a beautiful, polished distro but there are a few niggles there like getting multimedia to work. Ubuntu seems to do everything correctly first time, and makes installing software and keeping your system updated a breeze.
As for best Live CD, I generally only use those to check that a distro detects all my hardware. However, I've found SysRescueCD to be a fantastic tool.
Reply
Ben said 9:25AM on 9-19-2006
It's a bit like asking "What is the best car?". Everyone has their own requirements, and opinions about which is the best and why.
My opinion is use PCLinuxOS if you are a Linux newbie, and if you are a techhead that wants to learn how Linux works, the best you could choose is Slackware. Everyone should try Debian at some stage in their Linux career, and then decide that Ubuntu is better maintained and easier to work with.
Reply