Filed under: Audio, News, Web services, Google
Google is developing spy software
I know, no big surprise right? We all knew Google was evil deep down, at least a little bit. According to The Register, Google is planning on using "spy" software to catalog and categorize the background sounds heard while you're using your microphone on their VoIP/chat client, then serving you ads based on what they hear. I suppose if Google hears sheep in the background, they will show you hay and alfalfa ads, or kids in the background, they will show you ads for Barney videos and Cheerios. Obviously, there are many privacy issues here to be addressed, and I don't feel good about Google knowing every little thing that goes on in my house, just because I like my privacy and anonymity. Google would become big brother's best friend in a heartbeat. Imagine I have a romantic evening planned and forget to turn the microphone off, will Google sell me wine and chocolates the next day? I am morbidly interested in Google's strange fascination with sucking every last drop of usable information out of us, but not really interested in this kind of software that invades my privacy. I will give up a small degree of privacy online in text only, but recording my sounds? That seems too personal. What's next, reading my thoughts through some highly advanced retinal scan? Google wishes.
With Halloween fast approaching, it's a great time to get in some practice defending your territory against zombies. In Graveyard Shift, you take aim at zombies and other creepy-crawlies, blasting them into splatters of cartoony green guts. It's a casual first-person shooter, and it's very easy to get the hang of - use the mouse to aim, click to fire. Graveyard Shift has at least 15 levels, and it might even have some secret stages I haven't unlocked yet.
They key to getting good at Graveyard Shift is learning to use ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
resource said 5:51PM on 9-05-2006
I am usually quite paranoid but this sounds like bullshit.
The Googlemania has gone too far.
Worry about the NSA.
Not Google, yet.
Reply
CJ said 6:06PM on 9-05-2006
I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree with resource; I think we're going to have to raise the bullshit flag on this one. Do you really think that Google would be that brazen as to do something like this and think that they'll get away with it? I really do not. Once news got out about what was going on, they would literally be ruined, and their founders jailed (and that's not hype). Say what you will about Google, but they are not stupid when it comes to making business decisions. Since we all know that this would be a very bad business decision, it's far more likely that it's a big steaming pile than a story with any substance.
Reply
Ryan Carter said 6:13PM on 9-05-2006
You know, I thought it sounded a bit out there too, but honestly, I wouldn't really put it past Google. You never know until they actually put it out, but if they try such crap, I won't be very surprised.
Reply
nalgae said 6:20PM on 9-05-2006
As with RFID and other technology that identifies you, this is a step towards what I believe will be the ultimate direction of society. Though we may not reach the stages of 1984 without protest, I think something along the lines of Spielberg's interpretation of Minority Report might not be too far off.
Convenience and safety come at the cost of privacy. Once those things are in place, you can be sure that capitalist America will move in and take advantage of that.
I'm sure the only thing people are really afraid of is the wife seeing Google serving porno ads because of all those background sounds. I know what you're watching when she's not there. -squint-
Reply
Keeves said 6:25PM on 9-05-2006
Let's face it, this will NEVER happen. There would be such a back-lash from something like this that google would never risk it (and the benifits seem minimal for google anyway). I wouldn't be surprised if they have a test of this kind of technology, after all google doesn't release a fraction of what it's developed / testing. However, unless the concept is quite radically different from what you have described here then it will never be released )*IMHO* (after all how many people have a mic connected up, anyway, except possibly laptops)
I wouldn't be surprised if their developing something to give you different adds based upon what your listening to on your mp3s tho. After all most music players are doing this already.
Reply
Qwfwq said 6:26PM on 9-05-2006
It "sounds" very farfetched. And even if there was a shred of evidence it would never stand, it's next to wiretapping, to disrespectful of people's civil liberties to be considered ... at least for the time being.
Reply
Erin said 10:55AM on 9-06-2006
Man, I used to like Google. They are becoming too powerful now. I think they're scared of being taken over by MySpace.
Reply
Ryan Carter said 6:51PM on 9-05-2006
I can see it now, "Google falls in the MySpace apocalypse." No offense, but I really hope you're kidding.
Reply
phizm said 8:46PM on 9-05-2006
Do you think if i keep playing the sound of a cash register opening in the background they'll start sending me cash?
Reply
alex dante said 9:10PM on 9-05-2006
Do you _really_ think there's a qualitative difference between a computer algorithm that recognises keywords and serves related adverts and one that recognises audible sounds and ditto?
Google "itself" doesn't "hear" anything. There's no intelligence at the end of the line, just a weighted mechanism for determining what content to serve to you.
Reply
james said 9:30PM on 9-05-2006
So this would be different from Gmail how?
Reply
Robert said 1:38AM on 9-06-2006
Does this mean that we will finally have a working speech recognition engine as a by-product?
Now, that's what I'd call a huge collateral benefit...
Reply
RP said 1:50AM on 9-06-2006
It's actually very simple -- and anyone who has kids will confirm this:
If you hear a high pitched cry or scream in the background, the household has kids. Higher pitch = younger, or girls. Non-stop giggling/laughing/swearing? Teenagers. How hard is that to detect? Not very.
Reply
Patrick said 4:00AM on 9-06-2006
I didn't mind g-mail's screening but this.. is creepy
Reply
Tom said 12:59AM on 9-26-2006
I don't understand how exactly this would work but this technology seems a tad advance and expensive even for google. What would happen if it heard a murder would it contact the police to the location of the so called murder or would this be breaching our rights? Hey google might provide ads for body bags or something.
Reply
Tristan Guess said 1:15AM on 9-26-2006
Google rocks how good would it be for everyone to hear everything or google just to be able to hear everything... GO GOOOOOOGGGGGLLLLEEE
Reply