I just love making those "XYZ-killer" titles, though I suspect you readers tire of it. Anyhow, at Microsoft's WinHEC conference on Wednesday it
showed off Windows Media Photo, a new file format intended to displace JPEG. Though the CNet article isn't especially specific, Microsoft had all kinds of good things to say about its new baby, including how it can achieve twice the compression at the same quality as JPEG. The sticking point, of course, is the licensing. Windows Media Photo was created by the same team that built Windows Media Video and Audio, which does not suggest very open licensing terms, but Microsoft's Bill Crow says, "the philosophy has been that licensing should not be a restriction" to its adoption. I'd love to see a new image format with superior features, but we learned our lession from JPEG and GIF's patent issues, so that better be one unrestrictive license if Microsoft wants WMP to go anywhere. At any rate, even in the best case it will be years before it sees any widespread adoption. If you like technical documentation, Microsoft has the file format specifications
available on its web site, and Microsoft intends to release software for integrating WMP into hardware and software soon.
So, just how good at time waster games are you? Think you've got the stuff? Well, The World's Hardest Game 2.0 doesn't think you do.
Yes, amazingly, it's possible to have a sequel to a game called "The World's Hardest Game". It doesn't seem logically possible, since if the first one was actually the world's hardest, how could another one come along and share the moniker? It made me doubt the name in the first place. That is, until I tried the game.
The mechanics of the game are very simple. You are a small red square, ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Fabulo said 5:07PM on 5-26-2006
I like your illustration. For a moment I thought this is an old school looking digital camera :)
As long as manufacturers are wise and give me a choice between format. Kind of like my wma enabled mp3 player that also plays plain mp3...
This was also the claim of wma over mp3: better sound quality at 1/2 the rate.
Personally, I favor open, unpatented standards.
Then again, the new picture format may one day come in drm flavor, rooted in the trusted computing thing, so even YOUR pictures won't belong to you ... (insert evil sounding laugh: heeeeehehehehehe)
Reply
Sam said 5:31AM on 5-27-2006
I can't wait for DRM'd photos. Yipee.
Reply
Mike said 9:43AM on 5-27-2006
Oh, boy! Another M/S product -- another cracking opportunity!
Reply
Adam said 4:58AM on 5-28-2006
DRM for photos won't happen. Pictures are very different from movies and music, in which most content is created for profit and there is very little (comparitivly) in the way of individual content. With photos, I'd wager that the ration of personal versus commercial images is somewhere on the order of 10000 to 1. Probably a lot more, actually. Commercial photography is so small that DRM just doesn't make sense.
As for the WMA comparison, listen to a 64kbps WMA and then the same song as a 64kbps mp3. There's a huge difference. All things being equal, I'd rather use ogg vorbis, but WMA is a perfectly acceptable, highly versatile format and easily supperior to mp3.
If this new photo format ends up being to jpeg what WMA is to mp3, I'd say it will be a welcome addition and I will activly look for cameras that support it the next time I buy.
Reply
hitkaiser said 5:58AM on 5-28-2006
I welcome a replacement for JPEG since its ageing so badly, however, I am uneasy with Microsoft making it!
Reply
Brennan said 6:48PM on 5-28-2006
Oh joy, another proprietary image format! I'm really looking forward to the day when this gets wide enough acceptance that Microsoft can start demanding royalties from every software maker who want to support it.
Reply
Dilbert99 said 4:34AM on 5-29-2006
Whats wrong with PNG?!
(other than that MS can understand how to show transparency)
Do we really need yet another image format?
Reply
Andreas said 10:57AM on 5-29-2006
I sometimes try out JPEG2000. It seems really amazing, and it even works with transparency. It's a little too heavy on the processor though. PNG is a great format, but it would be even greater if it also allowed JPEG compression.. Perhaps Microsoft learns how to handle transparency when Vista comes out?
I can see future commercial web sites using DRM images all over their sites... and with this thing being pre installed in Vista... hm.. there will soon be platform to try it on.
Me personally... I never trust Microsoft's formats.
They just usually stink is why.
Reply
Anders said 7:21AM on 5-30-2006
JPEG patents revoked?
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060526105754880
Reply